The relationship between managerial feedback and professional satisfaction of primary education teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24917/20837276.14.6Słowa kluczowe
managerial feedback, professional satisfaction, motivation, empathy, manager, management, primary education teachersAbstrakt
In the contemporary educational environment, teachers’ professional satisfaction is closely linked to the quality of interactions with school managers, especially in terms of managerial feedback. That feedback represents not only a mechanism for correcting and guiding performance but also a way of recognizing and valuing the efforts made by teachers. Research in the field indicates a direct link between constructive feedback and the level of professional satisfaction, highlighting the fact that teachers who receive positive and concrete feedback from managers tend to have a higher level of motivation and professional fulfillment. The article aims to analyze the relationship between managerial feedback and professional satisfaction, based on the hypothesis that primary school teachers who receive constructive, relevant, and recurrent managerial feedback have a higher level of professional satisfaction, compared to those who perceive managerial feedback as insufficient, inadequate, or negative. Conceptual approaches to managerial feedback and its correlation with the professional satisfaction of primary school teachers are explored. It also outlines the types of managerial feedback – formative, positive, summative, and constructive – and their impact on teachers’ perceptions, aiming to identify managerial strategies that can improve the organizational climate and educational outcomes. This approach supports the need to better understand how effective managerial policies and practices can be implemented to support teachers’ professional development in terms of professional satisfaction.
Bibliografia
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Bocoș, M.D. (2013). Instruirea intercativă. Iași: Polirom.
Education Code of the Republic of Moldova. (2014). Retrieved from https://mecc.gov.md/sites/default/files/education_code_final_version_0.pdf
Education Development Strategy 2021–2030. (2022). Retrieved from https://gov.md/sites/default/files/document/attachments/subiect-02-nu-900-mec-2022_1.pdf
European Strategy for Education and Training 2030. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690630/EPRS_BRI(2021)690630_EN.pdf
Gamble, T.K., Gamble, M. (2002). Communication Works. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gordon, T., Burch, N. (2011). Profesorul eficient. București: Editura Trei.
Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., Taylor, M.S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371.
Kluger, A.N., DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
Locke, E.A. (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In M. D. Dunette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Longenecker, J.G. (1973). Principles of Management and Organizational Behavior. Merril Publishing Company, Ohio.
Pânișoară, I.O. (2015). Profesorul de succes. 59 de principii de pedagogie practică. Iași: Polirom.
Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
Strategic Framework for European Cooperation in Education and Training. (2021). Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/b004d247-77d4-11eb-9ac9-01aa75ed71a1
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 61
Liczba cytowań: 0
