The Effects of Income Inequality and Redistribution in Democracies: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach
  • /
  • The Effects of Income Inequality and Redistribution in Democracies: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach

The Effects of Income Inequality and Redistribution in Democracies: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach

Authors

  • Goksu Aslan University of Messina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/DEM.2017.002

Keywords

democracy, economic growth, inequality, redistribution

Abstract

In this paper, the simultaneous effects of the inequality and redistribution on economic growth are tested for the whole sample and for a subset of democratic countries, following system-GMM estimation on a panel dataset over a period from 1960 to 2010. Overall, net inequality has a negative significant effect on subsequent 5 years for both samples, while redistribution impact is only significant in democracies. The findings are related to the fact that in democracies, the governments tend to significantly redistribute more.

Author Biography

Goksu Aslan, University of Messina

I have recently completed my PhD degree in Economics Methods at the University of Messina and the Advanced Studies Program in International Economic Policy Research at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy. The focus of my research area is testing income inequality and redistribution effects on economic growth and negative effects of income inequality on economic growth directly and indirectly through transmission channels which cover sociopolitical instability, political economy and credit market imperfection channels, as well as financial inclusion, inequality and gender gap in financial inclusion with a particular focus on Sub-Saharan Africa. I work in both microeconometrics and macroeconometrics methods.

References

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2000), Why did the west extend the franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective, Q. J. Econ., 115, 1167–1199, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355300555042.

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510809.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J., Yared, P. (2009), Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis, J. Monet. Econ., 56, 1043–1058, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.10.002.

Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., Robinson, J. (2015), Democracy, redistribution and inequality, in A. B. Atkinson, Handbook of Income Distribution, vol 2B. Chapter 21 (pp. 1885–1996). Amsterdam: Elsevier, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59429-7.00022-4.

Acemoglu, D., Ticchi, D., Vindigni, A. (2011), Emergence and persistence of inefficient states, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 9(2), 177–208, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.01008.x.

Aidt, T., & Dallal, B. (2008), Female voting power: the contribution of women’s suffrage to the growth of social spending in Western Europe (1869–1960), Public Choice, 134(3–4), 391–417, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9234-1.

Aidt, T., Dutta, J., & Loukoianova, E. (2006), Democracy comes to Europe: franchise expan-sion and fiscal 1830–1938, Eur. Econ. Rev., 50(2), 249–283, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.07.004.

Aidt, T., & Jensen, P. (2009a), The taxman tools Up: an event history study of the introduction of the personal income Tax in western Europe, 1815–1941, J. Public Econ., 93, 160–175, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.07.006.

Aidt, T., & Jensen, P. (2009b), Tax structure, size of government, and the extension of the voting franchise in western Europe, 1860–1938, Int. Tax Public Fin., 16(3), 362–394, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9069-9.

Aidt, T., & Jensen, P. (2011), Workers of the World Unite! Franchise Extensions and the Threat of Revolution in Europe, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 1102, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, 1820–1938.

Aidt, T., & Jensen, P. (2013), Democratization and the size of government: evidence from the long 19th century, Public Choice, 157(3–4), 511–542, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0073-y.

Alesina, A., Rodrik, D. (1994), Distributive politics and economics growth, Q. J. Econ., 109, 465–490, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118470.

Baltagi, B. (2008), Forecasting with panel data, Journal of Forecasting, 27(2), 153–173.

Barro, R. J. (2000), Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries, Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, 5(1), 5–32, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850119329.

Barro, R. J., Lee, J. (1994), Sources of economic growth, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, 40(1), 1–46, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(94)90002-7.

Baum, C. (2006), An Introduction to Modern Econometrics using Stata, Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number imeus January.

Baum, C. (2013), Implementing new econometric tools in Stata, Mexican Stata Users' Group Meetings, Stata Users Group.

Bénabou, R. (1996), Inequality and Growth, CEPR Discussion Papers, 1450, C.E.P.R. Dis-cussion Papers.

Berg, A., Ostry, J., Tsangarides, C. (2014), Redistribution, inequality, and growth, IMF Staff Discussion Note, February.

Bond, S.R. (2002), Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice, Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141–162, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9.

Bond, S., Anke, H., Temple, J. (2001), GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models, CEPR Discussion Papers, 3048.

Breierova, L., Duflo, E. (2004), The Impact of Education on Fertility and Child Mortality: Do Fathers Really Matter Less Than Mothers?, NBER Working Papers, 10513, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Brown, D., Hunter, W. (1999), Democracy and social spending in Latin America, 1980–92, Am. Polit Sci. Rev., 93(4), 779–790, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2586112.

Burkhart, R. (1997), Comparative democracy and income distribution: shape and direction of the causal arrow, J. Polit., 59(1), 148–164, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2998219.

Cutler, D., Deaton, A., Lleras-Muney, A. (2006), The Determinants of Mortality, Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, 20(3), 97–120, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.3.97.

De Gregorio, J., Lee, J., (2002), Education and Income Inequality: New Evidence from Cross-Country Data, Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, 48(3), 395–416, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-4991.00060.

Foellmi, R., & Zweilmueller, J. (2006), Structural Change and the Kaldor Facts of Economic Growth, Meeting Papers, 342, Society for Economic Dynamics.

Gil, R., Mulligan, C., Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004), Do democracies have different public policies than nondemocracies?, J. Econ. Perspect., 18, 51–74.

Glaeser, E. (2003), Introduction to "The Governance of Not-for-Profit Organizations, NBER Chapters, 1–44.

Gradstein, M., Justman, M. (1999b), The democratization of political elites and the decline in inequality in modern economic growth, in Breizes, E.S., Temin, P. (Eds), Elites, Mi-norities and Economic Growth, Amsterdam: Elsevier,

Halter, D., Oechslin, M., Zweimüller, J. (2014), Inequality and growth: the neglected time dimension, Journal of Economic Growth, 19(1), 81–104, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10887-013-9099-8.

Huber, E., Stephens, J. (2012), Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226356556.001.0001.

Islam, N. (1995), Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach, The Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics, 110(4), 1127–70, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2946651.

Kaldor, N. (1956), Alternative Theories of Distribution, Review of Economic Studies, 23, 83–100.

Kaufman, R., Segura-Ubiergo, A. (2001), Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: a time-series cross-section analysis, 1973–97, World Polit., 53(4), 553–587, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0016.

Kuznets, S. (1955), Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Review, 65, 1–28.

Lee, C.-S. (2005), Income inequality, democracy, and public sector size, Am. Sociol. Rev., 70(1), 158–181, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000108.

Li, H., Squire, L., Zou, H. (1998), Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality, Econ. J., 108(1), 26–43, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00271.

Lindert, P. (1994), The rise of social spending, 1880–1930, Explor. Econ. Hist., 31(1), 1–37, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/exeh.1994.1001.

Lott Jr., J., Kenny, L. (1999), How dramatically did women’s suffrage change the size and scope of government?, J. Polit. Econ., 107(6), 1163–1198, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/250093.

Lucas, R. J. (1988), On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Eco-nomics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), 3–42, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7.

Mankiw, N.G, Romer, D., Weil, D.N. (1992), A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, 107(2), 407–437, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118477.

Meltzer, A., & Richard, S. (1981), A rational theory of the size of government, J. Polit. Econ., 89, 914–927, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261013.

Miller, G. (2008), Women’s suffrage, political responsiveness, and child survival in American history, Q. J. Econ., 123(3), 1287–1327, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.1287.

Muller, E. (1988), Democracy, economic development, and income inequality, Am. Sociol. Rev., 53(1), 50–68, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095732.

Nickell, S. (1981), Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects, Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1911408.

Okun, A. (1975), Equality and Efficiency: the Big Trade-Off, Brookings Institution Press.

Penn World Table, version 8.0. (2013), Retrieved from rug.nl/research/ggdc/data/pwt.

Perotti, R. (1993), Political Equilibrium, Income Distribution, and Growth, Review of Economic Studies, 60(4), 755–776, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2298098.

Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (2003), The Economic Effects of Constitutions, MIT Press, Cam-bridge.

Phillips, P., Sul, D. (2003), Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence, Econometrics Journal, 6, 217–259, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00108.

PolityIV Project. (2014), Retrieved from systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html.

Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J., Limongi, F. (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well-being in the World, 1950–1990, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804946.

Rodrik, D. (1999), Democracies pay higher wages, Q. J. Econ., 114, 707–738, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556115.

Roodman, D. (2006), How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to "Difference" and "System" GMM in Stata, Working Papers, 103, Center for Global Development, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982943.

Roodman, D. (2009), How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.

Rosenzweig, M., Binswanger, H. (1993), Wealth, Weather Risk and the Composition and Profitability of Agricultural Investments, Economic Journal, 103(416), 56–78, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234337.

Scheve, K., Stasavage, D. (2009), Institutions, Partisanship, and Inequality in the Long Run, World Polit., 61, 215–253, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109000094.

Scheve, K., Stasavage, D. (2010), The conscription of wealth: mass warfare and the demand for progressive taxation, Inter. Organ., 64, 529–561, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818310000226.

Scheve, K., & Stasavage, D. (2012), Democracy, war, and wealth: lessons from two centuries of inheritance taxation, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 106(1), 82–102, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000517.

Simpson, M. (1990), Political rights and income inequality: a cross-national test, Am. Sociol. Rev., 55(5), 682–693.

Sirowy, L., Inkeles, A. (1990), The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: a review, Stud. Comput. Inter. Develop., 25, 126–57, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02716908.

Solt, F. (2009), Standardizing the world income inequality database, Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 231–242, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00614.x.

Solt, F. (2014), SWIID Version 5.0., Retrieved from the standardized world income inequality database.

Stiglitz, J. (2012), The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future, W. W. Norton & Company.

Thewissen, S. (2013), Is it the income distribution or redistribution that affects growth?, Socio-Economic Review, 12(1), 545–571, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwt019.

Voitchovsky, S. (2005), Does the Profile of Income Inequality Matter for Economic Growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 273–296, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10887-005-3535-3.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-02

How to Cite

1.
ASLAN, Goksu. The Effects of Income Inequality and Redistribution in Democracies: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Dynamic Econometric Models [online]. 2 October 2017, T. 17, nr 1, s. 19–39. [accessed 22.10.2021]. DOI 10.12775/DEM.2017.002.

Issue

Vol. 17 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

The journal provides an Open Access to its content based on the non-exclusive licence Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 4.0).

To enable the publisher to disseminate the author's work to the fullest extent, the author must agrees to the terms and conditions of the License Agreement with Nicolaus Copernicus University.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 35
Number of citations: 0