Liquidity and Market Microstructure Noise: Evidence from the Pekao Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/DEM.2010.001Abstract
The availability of ultra-high frequency data justifies the use of a continuous-time approach in stock prices modeling. However, this data contain, apart from the information about the price process, a microstructure noise causing a bias in the realized volatility. This noise is connected with all the reality of trade. In the paper we separate the microstructure noise from the price process and determine the noise to signal ratio for the estimates of the realized volatility in the case of the shares of the Polish company Pekao S.A. The results are used to discover the optimal sampling frequency for the realized volatility calculation. Moreover, we check the linkages between the noise and some liquidity measures.
References
Aït-Sahalia, Y., Yu, J. (2009), High Frequency Market Microstructure Noise Estimates and Liquidity Measures, Annals of Applied Statistics, 3, 422–457.
Aït-Sahalia, Y., Mykland, P. A., Zhang, L. (2005), How Often to Sample a Continuous-Time Process in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise, Review of Financial Studies, 18(2), 351–416.
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T. (1998), Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do Provide Accurate Forecasts, International Economic Review, 39, 885–905.
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., Ebens, H. (2001), The Distribution of Realized Stock Return Volatility, Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 43–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00055-1
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Shephard, N. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Realised Volatility and Its Use in Estimating Stochastic Volatility Models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 64, Series B, 253–280.
Chan, L., Lakonishok, J. (1997), Institutional Equity Trading Costs: NYSE Versus Nasdaq, Journal of Finance, 52, 713–735.
Gottlieb, G., Kalay, A. (1985), Implications of the Discreteness of Observed Stock Prices, Journal of Finance, 40, 135–153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2328052
Hasbrouck, J. (1993), Assessing the Quality of a Security Market: A New Approach to Transaction Cost Measurement, Review of Financial Studies, 6, 191–212.
Huang, R., Stoll, H. (1996), Dealer Versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison of Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE, Journal of Financial Economics,41 (3), 313–357. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00867-E
Manganelli, S. (2005), Duration, Volume and Volatility Impact of Trades, Journal of Financial Markets, 8, 377–399. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2005.06.002
Roll, R. (1984), A Simple Model of the Implicit Bid–Ask Spread in an Efficient Market, Journal of Finance, 39, 1127–1139.
Tsay, R. S. (2002), Analysis of Financial Time Series, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley& Sons, New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471746193
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The journal provides an Open Access to its content based on the non-exclusive licence Creative Commons (CC BY-ND 4.0).
To enable the publisher to disseminate the author's work to the fullest extent, the author must agrees to the terms and conditions of the License Agreement with Nicolaus Copernicus University.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 459
Number of citations: 0
