Characteristics of Generations X and Y Educational Career-related Choices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/CSNME.2018.003Keywords
educational career choices, characteristics of choices, Generations X and Y, societal change, LithuaniaAbstract
A professional educational career-related choice that is understood as a process of decision-making that includes several career options is one of the most important decisions in human life. A chosen professional career path influences all areas of human life such as creation of close relations and family, social status, leisure, improvement, mobility, etc.
When members of Generation Y who are characteristic of different values and behaviours start to dominate in the labour market over the preceding Generation X, the conflict of generation that arises complicates labour relations.
Thus, the aim of this study is to define what are the characteristics of career-related choices of Generation Y and Generation X? How are characteristics of these choices related to the properties of each generation as highlighted in the generational theory as well as the historical and cultural contexts that have formed them? The following methods of research data collection where used: analysis of scientific literature and interview. The data obtained was analysed using qualitative content analysis.
It was determined that there were obvious differences between characteristics of educational career-related choices of members of Generation X and Generation Y. Comparing career-related choices between Generation X and Generation Y, it was revealed that the historical and cultural contexts had great influence on career-related choices of both generations.
References
Augustinienė A. (2007), Mokinių gebėjimų priimti karjeros sprendimus ugdymo galimybės bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje, Doctoral Dissertation, Kaunas: Kauno technologijos universitetas.
Augustinienė A., Stanišauskienė V. (2013), Būsimųjų informatikos specialistų karjeros sprendimų prielaidos. // “Šiuolaikinio specialisto kompetencijos: teorijos ir praktikos dermė : 7- osios tarptautinės mokslinės-praktinės konferencijos straipsnių rinkinys” = Competence of contemporary specialists: the unity of theory and practice: 7th international conference proceedings [e-issue], Kaunas: Kauno kolegija, 7, p. 228–236.
Benesh S. C. (2001), The key to a successful prospectus: Consult an advisor, early and often, “PS, Political Science & Politics”, 34(4), p. 853.
Brown S. D. & Rector C. C. (2008), Conceptualizing and diagnosing problems in vocational decision making. “Handbook of counselling psychology”, 4, p. 392-407.
Chester E. (2002), Employing Generation Why?, Tucker House Books.
Codrington G. (1997), Generations: From Silent, through Boomer and X, to Millennial, [referred on 2017/08/29] http://www.youthpastor.com/lessons/index.cfm/Article-Generations_From_Silent_through_Boomer_and_X_to_Millenial_124.htm#.VM_INGisXIc.
Comeau J. D., Tung L. Ch. (2013), Re-defining the Concepts of Generational Labelling Perspective from Malaysia, “ARPN Journal of Science and Technology”, 3(3), p. 259-276.
Cordeiro P. M. (2015), Cognitive-Motivational Determinants of Career Decision-Making Processes: Validation of a Conceptual Model, Doctoral Dissertation, Universidade de Coimbra.
Desy J. R., Reed D. A., Wolanskyj A. P. (2017), Milestones and millennials: a perfect pairing-competency-based medical education and the learning preferences of generation Y, “Mayo Clinic Proceedings”, 92(2), p. 243–250.
Erenda I., Mesko M., Bukovec B. (2014), Intuitive decision making and leadership competencies of managers in Slovenian automotive industry, “Journal of Universal Excellence”, 3(2), p. 87–101.
Flagler W. & Thompson T. (2014), 21st Century Skills: Bridging the Four Generations in Today’s Workforce, [referred on 2017/10/29]: http://cannexus.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/21st-Century-Skills-Bridhing-the-Four-Generations-in-Todays-Workforce-Flager-Thompson.pdf.
Garcia P. R., Restubog S. L., Bordia P., Bordia S., Roxas R. E. (2015), Career optimism: The roles of contextual support and career decision-making self-efficacy, “Journal of Vocational Behavior”, 88, p. 10–18.
Gati I., Gadassi R., Mashiah-Cohen R. (2012), Career decision-making profiles vs. styles: Convergent and incremental validity, “Journal of Vocational Behavior”, 81, p. 2–16.
Gati I., Landman S., Davidovitch S., Asulin-Peretz L., Gadassi R. (2010), From career decision-making styles to career decision-making profiles: A multidimensional approach, “Journal of Vocational Behavior”, 76, p. 277–291.
Gati I., Krausz M., Osipow S. H. (1996), A taxonomy of difficulties in career decision making, “Journal of Counseling Psychology”, 43(4), p. 510–526.
Germeijs V., Verschueren K. (2007), High school students’ career decision-making process: Consequences for choice implementation in higher education, “Journal of Vocational Behavior”, 70(2), p. 223–241.
Guay F. (2005), Motivations Underlying Career Decision-Making Activities: The Career Decision-Making Autonomy Scale (CDMAS), “Journal of Career Assessment”, 13(1), p. 77-97.
Hershatter A. & Epstein M. (2010), Millennials and the World of Work: An Organization and Management Perspective, “Journal of Business and Psychology”, 25, p. 211-223.
Howe N., Strauss W. (1991), Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069, New York: William Morrow & Company.
Howe N., Strauss W. (2007), The Next 20 Years: How Customer and Workforce Attitudes Will Evolve, “Harvard Business Review”, July–August, p.41-52.
Hurst J. L., Good L. K. (2009), Generation Y and career choice. The impact of retail career perceptions, expectations and entitlement perceptions, “Career Development International”, 14(6), p. 570-593.
Jarvis P., Holford J. , Griffin C. (2003), The theory & practice of learning, Psychology Press.
Jurkiewicz C. L. (2000), Generation X and the Public Employee, “Public Personnel Management”, 29(1), p. 55-74.
Kraus M. (2017), Comparing Generation X and Generation Y on their preferred emotional leadership style, “Journal of Applied Leadership and Management”, 5, p. 62-75.
Lent R. W., Ezeofor I., Morrison M. A., Penn L. T., Ireland G. W. (2016), Applying the social cognitive model of career self-management to career exploration and decision-making, “Journal of Vocational Behavior”, 93, p. 47-57.
Martin N. & Martins E. (2012), Assesing Millenials in the South African work context. Managing the new workforce. International Perspectives on the Millennial Generation, Edward Elgar Publishing Inc., USA, UK.
Mayring P. (2010), Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag.
McCrindle M. (2014), The ABC of XYZ. Understanding the Global Generations, McCrindle Researche Pty Ltd, Australia.
Nachmias S., Walmsley A. (2015), Making career decisions in a changing graduate labour market: A hospitality perspective, “Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education”, 17, p. 50-58.
Ng E., Lyons S. T., Schweitzer L. (Eds.), (2012), Managing the new workforce: International perspectives on the millennial generation, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pečiuliauskienė P., Valantinaitė I., Malonaitienė V. (2013), Z karta: kūrybingumas ir integracija, Vilnius: LEU leidykla.
Phillips S. D., Jome L. M. (2006), Career decision-making styles, “Encyclopedia of Career Development”, p. 95-97.
PricewaterhouseCoopers P. W. C. (2011), Millennials at Work. Reshaping the Workplace, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/financial-services/publications/assets/pwc-millenials-at-work.pdf [referred on 2017/10/29].
Stanišauskienė V. (2015), Karjeros sprendimus lemiančių veiksnių dinamika kartų kaitos kontekste, “Tiltai”, 71(2), p. 1-20.
Surgėlienė J. (2014), Educational Environments Empowering Students to Perform Reasoning on Their Career Choice: Summary of Doctoral Dissertation, Doctoral Dissertation, Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology.
Urbonavičiūtė I. (2010), Profesinio kelio rinkimosi vidiniai ir išoriniai veiksniai, Doctoral Dissertation, Vilnius: Vilnius University.
Wehmeyer M. L., Nota L., Soresi S., Shogren K. A., Morningstar M. E., Ferrari L., Sgaramella T. M., DiMaggio I. (2018), A crisis in career development: Life designing and implications for transition, “Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals”.
Wilson M., Gerber L.E. (2008), How Generational Theory Can Improve Teaching: Strategies for Working with the “Millennials”, “Currents in Teaching and Learning”, 1(1), p. 29-44.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 911
Number of citations: 0
