Looking back and forward: From the Net Generation to knowledge in education

Erik Bratland

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CSNME.2016.003

Abstract


The development of digital technologies and the Internet has changed modern society. Concepts such as “network society” and “Net Generation” are key concepts describing this development. In educational research, this development, in particular the use of new technologies by children and young adults, has created high expectations about changes in education. These expectations encompass the ideals of a transformation of learning in schools and a transition to student-centered forms of learning, guided by new concepts of knowledge in education. This article takes up these claims, pointing out that they are based on normative ideals and generalizations, which ignore the fact that the use of ICT is formed by pedagogical practices in education. Using the results of my earlier research, this article argues that ICT research should focus on these knowledge practices as well as on the organizational principles they are based on. These principles, here expressed as inherent knowledge-knower structures and specialized codes, are factors that can shed light on different forms of learning, knowledge building, and the use of ICT in education.


Keywords


Net Generation; new media; ICT in education; knowledge practices; knowledge-knower structures; specialized codes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakken, A. & Elstad, J. (2012), For store forventninger?, Kunnskapsløftet og ulikhetene i grunnskolekarakterer (Vol. nr. 7/12), Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring.

Bauerlein, M. (2008), The dumbest generation: how the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future, (or, don't trust anyone under 30), New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/ Penguin.

Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity, London: Sage.

Bell, D. (1973), The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting, New York: Basic Books.

Bernstein, B. (1990), Class, codes and control: 4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bernstein, B. (2000), Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bourdieu, P. & Passeron., J. C. (1990), Reproduction in education, society and culture ([New ed.] preface ... / by Pierre Bourdieu. ed.), London: Sage.

Bratland, E. (2000a), Bidrar media til en ironisk pseudo-offentlighet eller til en revitalisering av offentligheten?, „Fredrikke”, 4, HiNe.

Bratland, E. (2000b), Sosiale bevegelser og modernisering: Den kommunikative utfordring, „Fredrikke”, 7, HiNe.

Bratland, E. (2009), Homo Sapiens 2.0. Some social and cultural aspects of the new media, „Kognitywistyka i Media w Edukacji”, (1-2), p. 97-107.

Bratland, E. (2010a), Symbolsk makt, medier og demokrati, Torun: Adam Marszalek.

Bratland, E. (2010b), Agenter, nye medier og post - tradisjonelle samfunn [In:] Språk i medier, ed. D. Siemieniecka, B. Siemieniecki, H. Nilsen, E. Bratland, Torun: Nicolaus Copernicus University, p. 9-125.

Bratland, E. (2010c), Digital literacy in school: Functional or critical resource? [In:] Towards a better school. International perspectives, ed. E. Perzycka, US: Bois, p. 99-106.

Bratland, E. (2012a), The knowledge society and the future competence formation: Can Schools develop the digital competence of the net generation? [In:] Cyberprzestrzen i Educacja, ed. L. Tadeusz & B. Siemieniecka, Torun: Adam Marszalek, p. 23-40.

Bratland, E. (2012c), Meaning making, context and learning with digital media. A contextualized approach to digital literacies in schools [In:] Young people’s digital everyday life and education. New forms of self-formation, Learning and digital literacy, Torun: Adam Marszalek, p. 43-66.

Bratland E. & Siemieniecka, D. (eds.), Young people’s digital everyday life and the school. New forms of self-formation, learning and digital literacy, Torun: Adam Marszalek.

Bratland, E. (2012b), Digital media, knowledge, and learning in school: Some epistemological challenges for the education of today’s net generation [In:] ICT in Educational Design, vol. 1, ed. B. E. Polàczyk, Zielona góra: University of Zielona Góra Press, p. 37-54.

Bratland, E. (2013), ICT, great expectations, and realities: Is change from bellow an alternativ? [In:] ICT in Educational Design, vol. 3, ed. B. E. Polàczyk, Zielona Góra: University of Zielona Góra Press, p. 39-50.

Bratland, E. (2014), ICT, knowledge, and knowledge blindness: What kind of knowledge should students have access to in their education? [In:] ICT in Educational Design, vol. 5, ed. B. E. Polàczyk, Zielona Góra: University of Zielona Góra Press, p. 57-70.

Bratland, E., Siemieniecka, D. & Siemieniecki, B. (ed.) (2016), Knowledge, ICT and education. A variety of perspectives, Torun: Adam Marszalek.

Bratland, E. (2016), Knowledge, information and ICT: Does digital media require a new concept of knowledge in education? [In:] Knowledge, ICT and education: a variety of perspectives, Torun: Adam Marszalek, p. 12-34.

Bratland, E. (2016), ICT, the pedagogical discourse, and knowledge problems: What kind of knowledge should students have access to in school? [In:] Knowledge, ICT and education: a variety of perspectives, Torun: Adam Marszalek, p. 12-34.

Bratland, E. (2016), Reform, competence, and knowledge: paradoxes of knowledge in the neoliberal transformation of education [In:] Knowledge, ICT and education: a variety of perspectives, Torun: Adam Marszalek, p. 133-150.

Bratland, E. (2016), Knowledge and social background: Can knowledge reduce inequality? [In:] Knowledge, ICT and education: a variety of perspectives, Torun: Adam Marszalek, p. 151-166.

Bratland. E. (2016a), Knowledge building and ICT in subjects: How to make knowledge practices more central in educational ICT-research? [In:] ICT in Educational Design, vol. 10, ed. B. E. Polàczyk, Zielona Góra: University of Zielona Góra Press, p. 49-60.

Bratland. E. (2016b), The rules of the games: What role do specialized codes in the subjects play for the use of ICT in education? [In:] New Technologies in Education and Communication, Torun: Nicolaus Copernicus University, p. 201-216.

Buckingham, D. & Willett, R. (ed.) (2006), Digital generations, children, young people and New media. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bollier, D. (ed.), (1995), The Future of community and Personal Identity in the Coming Electronic Culture, Washington DC: Aspen Institute.

Castells, M. (1996), The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell.

Cuban, L. 2001. Oversold and Underused. Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Drucker, P. F. (1993), Post-capitalist society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Drotner, K. & Scrøder, K.C. (ed.) (2010), Digital content creation: perceptions, practices & perspectives, New York: Peter Lang.

Erstad, O. (2010), Kunnskapsbygging i kulturhistorisk perspektiv - materialitet, mediering og utforskende arbeidsmåter Kunnskap i skolen, Trondheim: Tapir akademisk, p. 113-124.

Friedman, T. L. (2005), The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux Giddens, A. 1994. “Living in a post Living in a post-traditional society” [In:] Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, ed. U. Beck, A. Giddens & S. Lash, Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 56-109.

Giddens, A. (1984), The constitution of society, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hatlevik, O., Ottestad, G., Skaug, H.J., Kløvstad, V. & Berge O. (2009), ITU Monitor 2009. Skolens digitale tilstand, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Ito, M. et al. (2009), Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Livingstone, S. & Bober, M. (2006), UK children go online: a child-centred approach to the experience of using the internet [In:] Information and communications technologies in society: e-living in a digital Europe, ed. Anderson, Ben and Brynin, Malcolm and Gershuny, J. and Raban, Yoel, London: Routledge.

Krumsvik, R. J. (2009), Ein ny digital didaktikk [In:] Å være digital i alle fag, ed. H. Otnes, Oslo: Universitetsforl.

KUF. (1996), Læreplanverket for den 10-årige grunnskolen (L97), Oslo: KUF.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003), New literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning, Buckingham: Open University Press.

Ludvigsen, S. (2015), Fremtidens skole: fornyelse av fag og kompetanser, NOU 2015:8, Oslo: KD.

Maton, K. (2014), Knowledge and knowers: towards a realist sociology of education, New York: Routledge.

Molander, B. (1996), Kunnskap i handling, Göteborg: Daidalos.

Prensky, M. (2001), Digital natives, digital immigrants, „On the Horizon”, 9(5), pp 1-6.

Prensky, M. (2010), Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Ryle, G. (1973), The concept of mind, Harmondswourth: Penguin.

Selwyn, N. (2011), Education and Technology: Key issues and debates, London: Continuum.

Shapiro, A. & R. Leone, (1999), The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World we know, New York: Public Affairs Century Foundation.

Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2006), Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy and tecnology [In:] The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, ed. R. K. Sawyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 97-115.

Tapscott, D. (1998), Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tapscott, D. (2009), Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Thompson, J.B. (2001), Medierne og moderniteten, København: Hans Reitzels forlag.

UFD. (2006), Kunnskapsløftet: læreplan for grunnskolen og videregående opplæring (LK06), Oslo: UFD.

Østerud, S. (2004), Utdanning for informasjonssamfunnet: den tredje vei, Oslo: Universitetsforl.

Wajcman, J. (2008), Life in the fast lane? Toward a sociology of technology and time, „The British Journal of Sociology”, 59, 1, p. 59-77.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Partnerzy platformy czasopism