Non-anthropocentric Philosophy Between Object-Oriented and Thing-Oriented Ontology, or on Some Repetition in the History of Philosophy

Magdalena Hoły-Łuczaj

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2018.036

Abstract


The paper analyzes differences between Graham Harman’s object-oriented ontology (OOO) and Jane Bennett’s new materialism as two possible non-anthropocentric ontologies. It also shows how their dissimilarity replicates the differences between Kazimierz Twardowski’s ontology whose OOO recognizes as its forerunner, and reism developed by his student Tadeusz Kotarbinski, who can be regarded as a predecessor of new materialism.


Keywords


Object-oriented ontology; new materialism; Harman; Bennett; Twardowski; Kotarbinski

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett Jane. 2015. Systems and Things: On Vital Materialism and Object-Oriented Philosophy. In R. Grusin (ed.), The Nonhuman Turn, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, [Kindle Edition].

Bennett Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham: Duke University Press, [Kindle Edition].

Brożek Anna. 2014. “The Significance of Kazimierz Twardowski in Philosophy and Culture,” Pro-Fil 15 (1): 32–46.

Bryant Levi, Nick Srnicek, Herman Graham. 2011. Towards a Speculative Philosophy. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, G. Harman (eds.), Speculative Turn. Continental Materialism and Realism, Melbourne: re.press.

Grusin Richard. 2015. Introduction. To R. Grusin (ed.), The Nonhuman Turn, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, [Kindle Edition].

Harman Graham. 2018. Object-Oriented Ontology. A New Theory of Everything, London: Penguin.

Harman Graham. 2011. The Quadraple Object, Washington: Zero Books.

Jonge Eccy. 2011. An Alternative to Anthropocentrism: Deep Ecology and the Metaphysical Turn. In R. Boddice (ed.), Anthropocentrism. Humans, Animals, Environments, Leiden-Boston: Brill.

Kirkman Robert. S 2002. keptical Environmenatlism. The Limits of Philosophy and Science, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Kotarbinski Tadeusz. 1952. “Humanistyka bez hipostaz”, Myśl Filozoficzna 1: 257– –270;

Kotarbinski Tadeusz. 1934. “Zasadnicze myśli pansomatyzmu”, Przegląd Filozoficzny 33, 283–294.

Kotarbinski Tadeusz. 1958. „O różnych znaczeniach słowa ‘materializm’”, [in] Tadeusz Kotarbinski, Wybor pism, vol. II, (Warszawa: PWN): 69–89.

Kotarbinski Tadeusz, The Reistic, or Concretistic, Approach, trans. O. Wojtasiewicz. In T. Kotarbinski, Gnosiology: The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, ed. G. Bidwell, C. Pinder, Pergamon Press 1966, access: 15.05.2018, http://www. ditext.com/kotarbinski/reism.html.

Leszczyński Andrzej. 1985. „O materializmie filozoficznym T. Kotarbinskiego”, Studia Filozoficzne 1: 120–134.

Shaviro Stephen. 2015. Consequences of Panpsychism. In R. Grusin (ed.), The Nonhuman Turn, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, [Kindle Edition].

Smith Barry. 1990. On the Phases of Reism. In J. Wolenski (ed.), Kotarbinski: Logic. Semantics and Ontology, 137–183 Dordrecht: Kluwer Academics Publisher.

Szaniawski Klemens. 1990. Philosophy of the concrete. In J. Wolenski (ed.), Kotarbinski: Logic. Semantics and Ontology, 185–190, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academics Publisher.

Twardowski Kazimierz. 1977. On the Content and Object of Presentations. A Psychological Investigation, trans. R. Grossmann, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Woleński Jan. 2016. Kazimierz Twardowski. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, acess: 15.05.2018, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/twardowski/https://plato. stanford.edu/entries/twardowski/.

Zareba Marta. 2015. On Tadeusz Kotarbinski Reism and the Praxeological Theory of Action. In A. Brozek, A. Chybinska, J. Jadacki, J. Wolenski (eds.), Tradition of the Lvov-Warsaw School: Ideas and Continuations, 197–213, Leiden–Boston: Brill.






Partnerzy platformy czasopism