“A Most Bewildering and Whirligig State of Mind”: Alternative Utopian Space in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2015.008Keywords
Utopia, Modernism, space, time, Virginia Woolf, Orlando, Vita Sackville-West, Ernst Bloch, Karl Mannheim, defamiliarisationAbstract
From its birth in Sir Thomas More’s Utopia (1516) to the present day, thinkers tend to regard utopia as either eutopia (“good place”), a blueprint of an ideal state which exists or can be made to exist, a critique of contemporary society, or utopos (“no place”), a mere escapist’s fantasy. These opposing views converged when utopia was revived as a trend of sociological thought in the early to mid-twentieth century. Karl Mannheim in the 1920s and Ernst Bloch in the 1960s share the idea that whether utopia is a dream or a reality might not be so important an issue as its being a sure sign of human ability to dream and hope for a better place. Virginia Woolf’s Orlando (1928), with its defamiliarisation technique and its aim to put readers in “a most bewildering and whirligig state of mind” of a manly woman/womanly man character living through five centuries as an English male aristocrat striding in a country estate to a female gypsy wandering in a desert, proposes a groundbreaking mental utopia which embraces the mentality of men and women across time, the positions of all social castes and classes, the bustling city and the calm countryside. Orlando not only marries the “granite-like” eutopia with the “rainbow-like” utopos but also questions the existing social norms and order.References
Bell, A. O. (Ed.) (1982). The Diary of Virginia Woolf, Vol. 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1920–24.
Bloch, E. (1985). The Principle of Hope, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
“Defamiliarisation”. In J. A. Cuddon (Ed.) (1999). The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. London: Penguin Books.
Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge.
Preface. Louis Wirth. Trans. Louis Wirth and Edward Shils. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner; New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Mead, M. (1957). Towards More Vivid Utopias. Science, New Series 126/3280, 957–61.
Ruppert, P. (1986). Reader in a Strange Land: The Activity of Reading Literary Utopias. London– Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Sackville-West, V. (1985). The Letters of Vita Sackville-West to Virginia Woolf. Ed. Louise DeSalvo and Mitchell A. Leaska. Intro. Mitchell A. Leaska. London: Papermac.
Sriratana, V. (2009). Unleashing the Underdog’: Technology of Place in Virginia Woolf’s Flush. Forum Vol. 8. http://www.forumjournal.org/article/view/622. DOA: 8 Feb. 2016.
Suvin, D. (1973). Defining the Literary Genre of Utopia: Some Historical Semantics, Some Genology, A Proposal and A Plea. Studies in the Literary Imagination 6/2, 121–145.
“utopia” In Craig Calhoun (Ed.) (2002) Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford Reference
Online. Oxford University Press. Chulalongkorn University Library. http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t104.e1743. DOA: 8 Feb. 2016.
Wirth L. (1936). Preface. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of
Knowledge. Karl Mannheim. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner; New York: Harcourt, Brace and company: xiii–xxxi.
Woolf, V. (1998). Orlando: A Biography. New York: Oxford University Press.
Woolf, V. (1967). The New Biography. Collected Essays IV. London: Hogarth Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 394
Number of citations: 0