¿Es coherente una cosmovisión naturalista? La argumentación de Plantinga contra el naturalismo desde la perspectiva de Artigas

Enrique Moros

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2016.033

Abstract


Is a naturalistic world view coherent?
Plantinga’s argumentation against naturalism from Artigas’ perspective

In this paper, I examine the critique of the naturalistic world view that Plantinga exposes based on the concept of world view formulated by Artigas. The analysis of the results of contemporary science carried out by the American thinker, stemming from his epistemological investigations, is largely coincident and convergent with that of Artigas, developed almost a decade in advance. The impossibility of sustaining a naturalistic belief, in keeping with the developments of contemporary science, contrasts with the success of the new atheists’ popular diffusion, which Artigas thoroughly studied in Oracles of Science. Both philosophers, Artigas and Plantinga, are examples of how philosophical excellence allows a more attentive interdisciplinary world view and a more extensive and precise knowledge.


Keywords


Artigas; Plantinga; world view; naturalism; epistemology; natural sciences; interdisciplinarity

Full Text:

PDF (Español)

References


Anderson, O. 2013. “Kinds of Gaps in Knowledge: The Conflict of Appeals to God and Methodological Naturalism in Developing Explanations of the World.” The Heythrop Journal: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology 54:574-589.

Arana, J. 2012. “La metáfora del relojero ciego. Virtudes y límites.” En La inteligencia en la naturaleza: del relojero ciego al ajuste fino del universo, editado por F. Rodríguez Valls, 15-34. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.

Artigas, M. 1999. La mente del universo, Pamplona: Eunsa.

Giberson, K., y M. Artigas. 2012. Oráculos de la ciencia: Científicos famosos contra Dios y la religión. Madrid: Encuentro.

Lewis, C. S. 2013. La abolición del hombre. Traductor Javier Ortega, 6a ed. Madrid: Encuentro.

Mancini, H. L. 2014. “Comentarios sobre la cosmovisión científica en Mariano Artigas.” Scientia et fides 2/1:59-79.

Plantinga, A. 2006. “Against Materialism.” Faith and Philosophy 23:3-32.

Plantinga, A. 2007. “Against ‘Sensible’; Naturalism (The Great Debate).” . Consultado el 28 de marzo de 2014.

Plantinga, A. 2008. “What is ‘Intervention’?”, Theology and Science 6:369-401.

Plantinga, A. 2011a. “Content and Natural Selection”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83/2:435-458.

Plantinga, A. 2011b. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford: OUP.

Poupard (Card.), P. 2000. “Foreword” en Mariano Artigas, The Mind of the Universe. Understanding Science and Religion. Radnor (Penn.): Templeton Press i-xxi.

Reeves, J. 2013. “On the Relation between Science and the Scientific Worldview.” The Heythrop Journal: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology 54:554-562.

Sols, I. 2013. “La ciencia lo dijo. Relaciones entre ciencia, razón y fe.” Scientia et Fides 1:87-149.

Wolterstorff, N. 2011. “Then, Now, and Al”, Faith and Philosophy 28/3:253-266.








ISSN 2300-7648 (print)
ISSN 2353-5636 (online)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism