Reasons to obey or disobey the law: pragmatic necessity of recourse to the legitimacy of the law-implementing institutions and procedural justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2020.026Keywords
obedience to the law, trust in institutions, legitimacy of the law implementing institutions, procedural justice, substantive justiceAbstract
I wanted to show that there is a strong empirical evidence that obedience to the law is based rather on procedural justice than on substantive justice, because the assessment of substantive justice of the law requires a very sophisticated normative reasoning. Procedural justice is comprehensible by a common sense based on practical experience of citizens who deal with the law executing institutions such as the police and the courts. The intermediary variable is the legitimacy of the law executing institutions such as the police and the courts. Due to a low level of trust and approval of the law-making institutions such as parliaments and governments their legitimacy is questionable, and thus the law makers cannot foster the moral duty to obey the law among subjects to the law.
References
Adams R., The expressive powers of law: theories and limits, Cambridge MA 2015. http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/why-do-people-obey-law (access:15.4.2020).
Blader S.I., Tyler T.R., A four component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a ‘fair’ proces, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin” 2003, Vol. 29.
Brockner J., Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favourability, „Academy of Management Review” 2002, Vol. 27.
Brockner J., Wiesenfeld B.M., The interactive impact of procedural and outcome fairness on reactions to a decision,“Psychological Bulletin” 1996, No. 120.
Deutsch M., Justice and conflict, in: The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, eds. M. Deutsch, P.T. Coleman, San Francisco 2000.
Hough M., Jackson J., Bradford, B. Legitimacy, trust and compliance: An empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European social survey’, in: Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration, eds. J. Tankebe, A. Liebling, Oxford 2013.
Johnson C. Trust in the military exceeds trust in other institutions in Western Europe and the U.S., September 2018, Pew Research Center.
Lind E.A., Tyler T.R., The social psychology of procedural justice, New York 1988.
Procedural justice, Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service, Published 17 June 2019, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/procedural-justice (access: 20.8.2020).
Solum L.B., Procedural justice, “Southern California Law Review” 2004–2005, Vol. 78.
Tyler T.R., Rasinski K., Spodick N., Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 1985, No. 48.
Tyler T.R., Why people obey the law, New Haven 1990.
Tyler T.R., Boeckmann R.J., Smith H.J., Huo Y.J., Social justice in a diverse society, Boulder 1997.
Tyler T.R., Huo Y.J., Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts, New York 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 371
Number of citations: 0