Ponavljanja kao oblik govorne disfluentnosti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LinCop.2011.015Słowa kluczowe
disfluentnosti, ponavljanja, samonadgledavanje, samoispravljanjaAbstrakt
Repetitions as a form of speech disfluency
The paper analyses repetitions considered as a form of speech disfluency. A recorded speech sample, in the Croatian language, lasting for approximately eight hours has been transcribed. 101 students of technical studies at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture in Split took part in the recordings. Various quantities describing the frequency and duration of repetitions in syllables and words have been measured, and corresponding frequency diagrams have been presented. The absolute majority of all repetitions is of very short duration, comprising up to one completed syllable. In most cases repetitions are not followed by any kind of disfluency. While repeating, the speakers usually respect the integrity of syllables or words, except when repeating one incomplete (interrupted) syllable or word. The tendency of repeating shorter speech fragments, which are not preceded by any kind of disfluency, points primarily to problems arising at lower processing levels. The results of this study confirm the view that repetitions are systematically organized phenomena and they are not a chaotic aspect of spoken discourse.
Bibliografia
Baars B. J., Motley M. T., MacKay D. G., 1975, Output editing for lexical status
in artificially elicited slips of the tongue, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behaviour 14, s. 382–391.
Berg T., 1986, The problem of language control: Editing, monitoring and feedback,
Psychological Research 48, s. 133–144.
Blackmer E. R., Mitton J. L., 1991, Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs
in spontaneous speech, Cognition 39, s. 173–194.
Bortfeld H., Leon S. D., Bloom J. E., Schober M. F. Brennan S. E., 2001, Disfluency
Rate in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender,
Language and Speech 44 (2), s. 123–147.
Branigan H., Lickley R., McKelvie D., 1999, Non-linguistic influences on rates of
disfluency in spontaneous speech. Proceedings of the ICPhS. ICPhS, San Francisco,
s. 387–390.
Bredart S., 1991, Word interruption in self-repairing, Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 20, s. 123–137.
Clark H. H., Wasow T., 1998, Repeating words in spontaneous speech, Cognitive
Psychology 37, s. 201–242.
Dell G. S., 1986, A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production,
Psychological Review 93, s. 283–321.
Erdeljac V., 2009, Mentalni leksikon: modeli i činjenice, Zagreb: Ibis grafika.
Fox B. A., Hayashi M., Jasperson R., 1996, Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic
study of syntax and repair, U: E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, S. A. Thompson (ur.),
Interaction and Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 185–237.
Fox Tree J. E., 1995, The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of
subsequent words in spontaneous speech, Journal of Memory and Language 34,
s. 709–738.
Garnsey S. M., Dell S. G., 1984, Some neurolinguistic implications of prearticulatory
editing in production, Brain and language 23, s. 64–73.
Garrett M. F., 1982, Production of speech: observations from normal and pathological
language use, U: A. W. Ellis (ur.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions,
London: Academic Press, s. 19–76.
Horga D., 2008, Prekid izričaja i ponavljanje u govornoj proizvodnji, Philologica 11,
s. 31–42.
Jaeger J. J., 2005, Kids’ slips. What young children’s slips of the tongue reveal about
language development, Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.
Lennon P., 1990, Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitive approach, Language Learning
, s. 387–417.
Levelt W. J. M., 1992, Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and
representations, Cognition 42, s. 1–22.
Levelt W. J. M., 1993, Language use in normal speakers and its disorders, U: G. Blanken,
J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J. C.Marshall, C.-W. Wallesch (ur.), Linguistic disorders
and pathologies, Berlin: deGruyter, s. 1–15.
Lickley R. J., 1994, Detecting Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, doktorska disertacija,
University of Edingburgh.
Maclay H., Osgood C. E., 1959, Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech,
Word 15, s. 19–44.
Mildner V., 2003, Govor između lijeve i desne hemisfere, Zagreb: IPC grupa.
Motley M. T., Camden C. T., Baars B. J., 1982, Covert formulation and editing of
anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of
the tongue, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 21, s. 578–594.
Nakatani C. H., Hirschb erg J., 1994, A corpus-based study of repair cues in spontaneous
speech, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (3), s. 1603–
–1616.
Nooteboom S., 1980, Speaking and unspeaking: detection and correction of phonological
and lexical errors in spontaneous speech, U: V. A. Fromkin (ur.), Errors in
linguistic performance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand, New York: Academic
Press, s. 87–96.
Norman D. A., 1981, Categorization of action slips, Psychological Review 88, s. 1–15.
Oomen C. C. E., Postma A., 2001, Effects of divided attention on the production of
filled pauses and repetitions, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research
, s. 997–1004.
Postma A., 2000, Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech
monitoring models, Cognition 77, s. 97–131.
Postma A., Kolk H., 1992, The effects of noise masking and required accuracy on
speech errors disfluencies and self-repairs, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
, s. 537–544.
Postma A., Kolk H., 1993, The covert repair hypothesis: Prearticulatory repair processes
in normal and stuttered disfluencies, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
, s. 472–487.
Postma A., Kolk H., Povel D. J., 1990, On the relation among speech errors, disfluencies
and self repairs, Language and Speech 33, s. 19–29.
Rieger C. L., 2000, Self-repair Strategies of English-German Bilinguals in Informal
Conversations: The Role of Language, Gender and Proficiency, doktorska disertacija,
University of Alberta.
Rieger C. L., 2003, Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations,
Journal of Pragmatics 35, s. 47–69.
Schegloff E. A., 1979, The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation, U: T. Givon
(ur.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, New York: Academic
Press, s. 261–286.
Shriberg E. E., 1994, Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfluencies, doktorska
disertacija, University of California, Berkley.
Stemberger J. P., 1985, An interactive activation model of language production,
U: A. W. Ellis (ur.), Progres in the psychology of language, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, s. 143–186.
Van Hest G. W. C. M., 1996, Self-repair in L1 and L2 production, Tilburg: University
Press.
Wheeldon L. R., Levelt W. J. M., 1995, Monitoring in the time course of phonological
encoding, Journal of Memory and Language 34, s. 311–334.
Wiese R., 1984, Psycholinguistische Aspekte der Sprachproduktion: Sprechverhalten
und Verbalisierungsprozesse, Dűsseldorf: Universität Bielefeld.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 391
Liczba cytowań: 0