No successful infinite regress

Laureano Luna



We model infinite regress structures — not arguments — by means of ungrounded recursively defined functions in order to show that no such structure can perform the task of providing determination to the items composing it, that is, that no determination process containing an infinite regress structure is successful.


infinite regress; order; non well-foundedness; recursion; ungroundedness; recursively defined function; determination system

Full Text:



Benardete, J., Infinity: An Essay in Metaphysics, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1964.

Black, O., “Infinite regress arguments and infinite regresses”, Acta Analytica, 16/17 (1996): 95–124.

Gratton, C., Infinite regress arguments, Dordrecht, Springer, 2009.

Maurin, A-S., Infinite Regress Arguments. Johanssonian Investigations: Essays in Honour of Ingvar Johansson in his Seventieth Birthday, C. Svennerlind, J. Almäng and R. Ingthorsson (eds.), Heusenstamm, Ontos Verlag, 2013.

Hume, D., [1779] Dialogue Concerning Natural Religion, H.D. Aiken (ed.), New York, Hafner Pub. Co., 1966.

Johansson, I., “Proof of the existence of universals – and Roman Imgarden’s ontology”, Metaphysica, 10 (2009): 65–87. DOI: 10.1007/s12133-008-0040-0

Johnstone, H.W., Jr., “The rejection of infinite postponement as a philosophical argument”, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 10 (1996): 92–104.

Luna, L., “Ungrounded causal chains and beginningless time”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 18 (2009): 297–307. DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2009.014

Pruss, A., “The Hume-Edwards principle and the cosmological argument”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 43: 149–165.

ISSN: 1425-3305 (print version)

ISSN: 2300-9802 (electronic version)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism