Events as shadowy entities

Uwe Scheffler

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.1994.003

Abstract


The general background of this paper_ is causal theory. Events are involved in causal theory in a very natural way: People want to assert causal sentences and in at least some of these sentences terms occur describing events.

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Brand, Intending and Acting, Cambridge, London 1984.

C. Cleland,“On the Individuation of Events”, Synthese 86, 1991, pp. 229–254.

D. Davidson, “The Individuation of Events”, [in:] Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, ed. by A. Anderson and others, Dordrecht 1969, pp. 216–234.

H. Geser, “Elemente zu einer soziologischen Theorie des Unterlassens”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 38, 1986, pp. 643–669.

H. Geser, “Ueber die wachsende Bedeutung des Unterlassens in der ‘Aktiven Gesellschaft’ ”, Schweizer Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 1986, pp. 71–90.

J. Kim, “Events and Their Descriptions: Some Considerations”, [in:] Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, ed. by A. Anderson and others, Dordrecht 1969, pp. 198–215.

D. Lewis, “Events”, [in:] Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, New York, Oxford 1986, pp. 241–269.

L. Lombard, Events A Methaphysical Story, London, Boston, Henley 1986.

B. Russell, “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism”, [in:] Logic and Knowledge, London 1964.

A. Sinowjew, H. Wessel, Logische Sprachregeln, Berlin 1975.

P. Simons, Parts A study in Ontology, Oxford 1987.

M. Urchs, “Causal Priority — Towards a logic of event causation” (unpublished manuscript).

J. van Benthem, The Logic of Time, Dordrecht, Boston, London 1983.

P. van Inwagen, An Essay on Free Will, Oxford 1983.

H. Wessel, Logik, Berlin 1984.








Print ISSN: 1425-3305
Online ISSN: 2300-9802

Partnerzy platformy czasopism