Tomasz Kacała



The aim of the paper is to present the role of military leadership in Strategic Communication (StratCom). The contents of the paper include the major shift in understanding military operations and their environment, the main idea of StratCom and its evolution, and the essential StratCom functional areas. Having the background established, the paper discusses the principle of the key leaders’ involvement (engagement). The principle is a fundamental prerequisite for effective StratCom, which proves the importance of military leadership in this field. The paper also includes the practical and theoretical implications referring to the assumptions of the positive management concept. 


strategic communication; military leadership; information environment; principles; key leaders’ engagement; positive management

Full Text:



AD 95–2 (2009), ACO Strategic Communications, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, 19 November.

AJP-3.10 (2009), Allied Joint Doctrine for Information Operations, NATO Standardization Agency, November.

AJP-3.10.1 (2014), Allied Joint Doctrine for Psychological Operations, NATO Standardization Agency, September.

JP 3–13 (2014), Information Operations, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 20 November, available at: (accessed 16 March 2015).

Kacała, T. (2012), “Komunikacja strategiczna”, Przegląd Morski, No. 3, pp. 17–27.

Lipińska, J., Kacała, T. (2014), Komunikacja strategiczna i Public Affairs, Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej, Warszawa.

Łydka, W. (2014), Przywództwo wojskowe, Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej, Warszawa.

MC 422/3 (2007), NATO Military Policy on INFO OPS, NATO Standardization Agency. Morrow, D., Conger S. (2015), “Exploring Meaningfulness in Work: Why Sensitivity Matters”, Journal of Positive Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 3–14, available at: mid=226 (accessed 10 August 2016).

NATO Bi-SC Information Operations Reference Book (2010), NATO.

NATO Military Concept for Strategic Communications (2010), Allied Command Transformation, 27 July.

“Origins of the term Public Diplomacy”, available at: http://pdaa.publicdiplomacy. org/?page_id=6 (accessed 31 January 2015).

PO 0141 (2009), NATO Strategic Communications Policy, NATO International Staff, 29 September.

QDR Execution Roadmap for Strategic Communication (2006), U.S. Department of State, Washington DC, available at: (accessed 16 March 2015).

Report of Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication (2004), U.S. Department of Defense, Washington DC, available at: (accessed 16 March 2015).

Stankiewicz, W. (2012), “Dyplomacja publiczna – amerykański punkt widzenia”, Historia i Polityka, Vol. 7 No. 14, pp. 101–121, available at: index.php/HiP/article/view/1475 (accessed 16 March 2015). DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.12775/1475

Stavridis, J. G. (2007), “Strategic Communication and National Security”, Joint Force Quarterly, Vol. 46, pp. 4–7, available at: (accessed 16 March 2015).

Strategic Communication in Multinational Coalition Operations Within a Comprehensive Approach. Working Draft. Version 1.0 (2009), Strausberg, 30 November.

Van Elst, D., Meurs D. (2015), “Positive Management: The Relationship Between The Psychological Contract, Employee Engagement and Organisational Commitment”, Journal of Positive Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 39–52, available at: http:// 81&Itemid=229 (accessed 10 August 2016).

Action funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education under the contract number 916/P-DUN/2019 by funds dedicated to dissemination of research findings. Preparing for publication papers in English and employing reviewers affiliated in research institutions abroad in 8 issues of the Journal of Positive Management in 2019-2020: Vol. 10, No. 1-4, Vol. 11, No. 1-4.

Partnerzy platformy czasopism