After Crisis? – The Only Way: Economics for Sustainable Development

Mestwin Stanisław Kostka

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL2011.002

Abstract


  The aim of the paper is to justify why contemporary economics must be reoriented from the direction of Economic Growth to the direction of Sustainable Development. Human society is at a deadly curve. The Economic crisis is only one slice of Gordon’s Knot of Crises of our Civilization. The Economy is facing system challenges without precedence. Reasons for this situation are different fetishes of present positive and normative economics. The au­thor explores the main aspects of diagnoses, prognoses, analyses, assessments, and present solutions concerning economy. Of fundamental importance are: the essence of the global cri­sis, new challenges facing Western civilization in the near future, and fundamental misunder­standings in the proposed solutions of crucial problems. The one chance for an adequate solu­tion to the critical situation is the Strategy of Sustainable Development. In Poland this strategy is absent in mainstream economics as a theory of economy and as the foundation of rational policy. It concerns a very broad front of economic sciences and economic technologies. Eco­nomic academic education is also not adequate to the very serious situation facing graduates in the future. Consciousness, knowledge and abilities of economic professionals are good for the past, not for the nearest future. In Poland, an additional problem is a lack of common eco­nomic academic education in English. Present economics and economy must be verified with many original (not translated) settlements and conclusions concerning sustainable develop­ment from economics and from other sciences and from reality outside economy. Of crucial importance have been settlements and conclusions of ecology and of sociology on the basis of information technologies.


Keywords


economics; economic crisis; economic growth; sustainable development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bachmann G. (2007), Catching a glimpse of future. In I. Niestroy (ed.) Stimulating informed debate – Sustainable Development Councils in EUMember States. Acompilation of tasks, capacities, and best practice. EEACWorking Group on Sustainable Development.

Bertalanffy L. V. (1951), The General System Theory, Buman Biology, 23, 1951, and many later publications. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/I.2.134

Boulding K. E. (1966), A Reconstruction of Economics, Science Edition, New York.

Estimates of Population Change for Metropolitan Statistical Areas and Rankings: July 1, 2008 to July 1, 2009. U.S. Census Bureau. 2009-04. http://www.census. gov/popest/metro/tables/2009/CBSA-EST2009-05.csv. Retrieved October 26, 2010.

George H. (1879), Progress and Poverty. London.

Kapp W. K. (1962), The Social Costs of Private Enterprises.

Lange O(1949), Ekonomia, KiW, Warszawa, p. 9.

Littlejohn D. (ed.) (1999), The Real Las Vegas: Life Beyond the Strip, Oxford University Press.

Malthus T. R. (1798), An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society, London.

Marx K., different settlements and conclusions

McCarthy D., Spencer K (1992), Modern Economics, Mentor Publication, p 12–14.

Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J., Behrens W. (1972), The Limits to Growth, London.

The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth (1962), New York.

Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1983), p. 458.

World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (1987), Oxford University Press, New Haven, pp. 2–10








p-ISSN 1689-765X
e-ISSN 2353-3293

Partnerzy platformy czasopism