Natalia Karpchuk



The article focuses on the national dimensions of the EU communication policy in Sweden, Finland and Denmark. The cornerstone of the EU communication policy is the dialogue with citizens about the policies and the future of the EU. It is based on openness, transparency and accountability which greatly contribute to building citizens’ trust in the authorities’ activity. EU communication policy is realized through e-governance, language policy and the policy in the sphere of mass media. The aim of the article is to analyze the experience and best practices of top 3 EU countries (Sweden, Finland and Denmark) in terms of the assessment of national policies in the field of ICT and digital skills of citizens in the sphere of communication policy. The hypothesis is that these states being the leaders as to citizens’ digital literacy have introduced efficient channels of involving citizens in the decision making process.

Słowa kluczowe

communication policy; e-participation; language policy; participatory democracy

Pełny tekst:



Action Plan to improve communicating Europe by the Сommission. Brussels, 20.7.2005 SEC(2005) 985 final. Retrieved from

Communication Policy as the Source of Citizens’ Trust 79 Agreement on the new Government Programme – An open, fair and confident Finland,

Government Communications Unit Press release 182/2011 17.6.2011, Ministry of Foreign affairs of Finland. Retrieved from

Bernhard, I. (October 2010). E-government and E-governance – Swedish Case Studies with Focus on the Local Level. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology. Retrieved from

Braid, F.R., Tuazon, R.R. & Gamolo, N.O. (2007). A Reader on Information and Communication Technology. Retrieved from’who/whos’who-comm-ed-braid.htm.

Can EU hear me? How to get the EU’s message out. (October 2004). Friends Of Europe. Friends of Europe and Gallup Europe. Retrieved from

Communicating Europe in Partnership, Brussels, 3.10.2007 COM(2007) 568 final. Retrieved from

Communication Policy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, 2014. Retrieved from


Dias, M.A.R., Lee, J.A.R., Nordenstreng, K. & Wiio, O.A. (1979). National Communication Policy Councils: Principles and Experiences. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from

Duelund, P., Valtysson, B. & Bohlbro, L. (2013). Cultural Policy Profile. Denmark. Retrieved from

En uthållig demokrati! Politik för folkstyrelse på 2000-talet: Demokratiutredningens betänkande. (2000). Statens of Offentliga Untretningal: Stockholm. Retrieved from

Finland’s Action Plan on Open Government, Open government Partnership. Retrieved from

Harding, T. (2014). Cultural Policy Profile. Sweden. Retrieved from

Husing, T. & Korte, W.B. (October 2010). Evaluation of the Implementation of the Communication of the European Commission E-Skills for the 21 century. Retrieved from

Karlsson, M., Åström, J. & Jonsson, M. (2013). Participation Policy in Sweden. In: H. Hinsberg, M.E. Jonsson, M. Karlsson (eds.), Citizen centric e-participation. A trilateral collaboration for democratic innovation. Case studies on e-participation policy: Sweden, Estonia and Iceland, Praxis Center of Political Studies: Tallin. Retrieved from

Kuutti, H., Sokka, R. & Nevalainen, P. (October 2010). The case of Finland. In: H. Kuutti, R. Sokka, P. Nevalainen (eds.), Background information report. Media policies and regulatory practices in a selected set of European countries, the EU and the Council of Europe: The case of Finland, eMediadem. Retrieved from

Making All Voices Count – Engaging Citizens through Innovation and Technology. The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, 24.05.2014. Retrievedfrom

Mitchell, R. & Kanerva, A. (2014). Cultural Policy Profile. Finland. Retrieved from http://www.cultural

Søndergaard, H. & Helles, R. (October 2010). The case of Denmark. In: H. Søndergaard, R. Helles, Background information report. Media policies and regulatory practices in a selected set of European countries, the EU and the Council of Europe: The case of Denmark, Emediadem. Retrieved from

Sweden praised for aid transparency, Regeringskansiet Government Office of Sweden. Retrieved from 23.10.2013

The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan-D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate. Brussels, 13.10.2005 COM(2005) 494 final. Retrievedfrom

The digital path for future welfare: e-government strategy 2011–2015, (August 2010). The Danish Government/Danish Regions/Local Government Denmark. Retrieved from Servicemenu/English/Policy-and-Strategy/eGOV -strategy.

Transparency through consultation and communication in Better Regulation in Europe: Denmark 2010, (2010) Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from

White Paper on a European Communication Policy. Brussels, 1.2.2006COM(2006) 35 final.Retrieved from

Дойч, К. (2010). Народи, нації та комунікація. Київ, Смолоскип: “Націоналізм: ан-тологія”. C. 546–566.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Partnerzy platformy czasopism