Energy issues in the European Union’s foreign policy towards the states of the South Caucasus

Rafał Willa

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/21525

Abstrakt


The Common Foreign and Security Policy is one of these areas of the European Union’s activity which arouses wide interest due to the broad spectrum of issues addressed there (i.a. democracy, the rule of law, trade, and issues related to civil, military and energy security) as well as to continuous evolvement of the Policy itself. Thus this area provides an abundance of issues to research on, discuss and assess, while professional diplomats regard it as a vital tool for attaining common goals that are significant from the perspective of a larger whole rather than only that of individual member states. One of such goals is to ensure energy security of the European Union. With this in mind, it is impossible for EU diplomacy to overlook the states of the South Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, both with regard to their energy resources and geographical location. Is the South Caucasus truly the EU’s natural direction of improving its energy security? Are these countries able to help the European Union diversify its sources of energy supplies? Finally, are the states of the South Caucasus interested in that? These are only some of the questions the following article should answer.


Słowa kluczowe


European Union; South Caucasus; foreign policy; energy industry; security

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Abolhosseini, S., Heshmati, A. & Rashidghalam, M. (2017). Energy security and competition over energy resources in Iran and Caucasus region. AIMS Energy, 5(2).

Alieva, L. (2006). EU and South Caucasus. CAP Discussion Paper, 12.2006.

Boonstra, J. & Delcour, L. (2015). A broken region: evaluating EU policies in South Caucasus – Analysis. Retrieved from http://fride.org/descarga/29.01.2015_EurasiaReview_US_JB.pdf.

Csabay, J. (2017). EU Policy towards Azerbaijan: Coherence, Policy Shifts and the Upcoming Agreement. STRATPOL Policy Papers, 14 November 2017.

Efe, H. (2012). Foreign Policy of the European Union Towards the South Caucasus. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(17).

European Commission. (2007). Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament of 10 January 2007, “An energy policy for Europe” [COM(2007) 1 final – Not published in the Official Journal]. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l27067&from=EN.

European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on security of energy supply and international cooperation – “The EU Energy Policy: Engaging with Partners beyond Our Borders”. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0539&from=en

European Commission - Directorate-General for Trade. (2018a). Armenia. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113345.pdf

European Commission - Directorate-General for Trade. (2018b). Azerbaijan. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113347.pdf.

European Commission - Directorate-General for Trade. (2018c). Georgia. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113383.pdf

European Parliament. (2017). EU relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan. Retrieved from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/133502/EU%20relations%20with%20Armenia%20and%20Azerbaijan.pdf

European Union. (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign And Security Policy. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en

Gasimli, V. (2015). Trade, economic and energy cooperation: challenges for a fragmented region. In The South Caucasus. Between integration and fragmentation. Retrieved from http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_5598_article_2_-_amanda_paul_-_eu.pdf?doc_id=1631

Genté, R. (2013). Energy Competition in the South Caucasus: Driver of Stability or Instability? In E.M. Felberbauer & F. Labarre (eds.), De-conflicting Protracted Conflicts in the South Caucasus: The Role of the EU and NATO. Vienna: National Defence Academy and Bureau for Security Policy at the Austrian Ministry of Defence.

Gevorgyan, N. (2015). The EU’s Strategic Interests in the South Caucasus: from a Bystander to Perceived Interests. Armenian Journal of Poltical Science, 2(3).

Girgin, D. (2016). Analyzing of the Geopolitical Energy Confrontation in the Caucasus: Role of Iran, After Sanctions Were Lifted. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(6).

Gogolashvili, K. (2017). Georgia-EU Relations and Future Perspectives. Tbilisi: Georgian Center for Security and Development.

Green Alternative. (2015). Georgia and European Energy Community. The Challenges of EU Integration. Retrieved from https://greenalt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Georgia_and_European_Energy_Community.pdf

Hale, J. (2012). EU relations with Azerbaijan: More for Less? Retrieved from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/eu-relations-azerbaijan-20120606.pdf

Jarosiewicz, A. (2014). Azerbaijan – a growing problem for the West. OSW-CES Commentary, 15.09.2014.

Khachatryan, D. (2015). The EU’s Niche in the New South Caucasus: Old Partners, New Challenges. Retrieved from http://tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/The_EUs_Niche_In_The_South_Caucasus_Old_Partners_New_Challenges.pdf Kobzova, J.& Alieva, L. (2012). The EU and Azerbaijan: Beyond the Oil. ECFR Policy Memo, 22.05.2012.

Kostanyan, H. & Giragosian, R. (2017). EU-Armenian Relations: Charting a fresh course. CEPS Research Report, 14.

Kusznir, J. (2011). The Nabucco Gas Pipeline Project and its Impact on EU Energy Policy in the South Caucasus. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 33.

Legucka, A. (2018). Uregulowanie statusu Morza Kaspijskiego. Biuletyn PISM, 116 (1689).

Nuriyev, E. (2007). EU Policy in the South Caucasus. A view from Azerbaijan. CEPS Working Document, 272.

Pataraia, T. (2015). Energy transit and security imbalance in South Caucasus. The road between Russia and the European Union. Retrieved from: http://ge.boell.org/sites/default/files/uploads/2015/03/energy_eng-final_1.pdf

Paul, A. (2015). The EU and the South Caucasus – Time for a Stocktake. In The South Caucasus. Between integration and fragmentation. Retrieved from: http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_5598_article_2_-_amanda_paul_-_eu.pdf?doc_id=1631 (11.08.2018).

Paul, A. (2016). The EU and the South Caucasus 25 Years Since Independence. Retrieved from https://eu.boell.org/sites/default/files/uploads/2016/11/the_eu_and_the_south_caucasus_25_years_since_independence_0.pdf (24.08.2018).

Sammut, D. (2016). Georgia and the EU – maintaining the momentum. European Policy Centre. Retrieved from https://www.epc.eu/pub_details.php?cat_id=4&pub_id=6796

South Caucasus Energy Forum (SCEF). (2014). Energy Diversification Trends in the South Caucasus and the Neighborhood. Tbilisi: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Special Eurobarometer 476. (2018). EU citizens and development cooperation. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/SPECIAL/surveyKy/2202.

Tartes, A. (2015). The Limited Influence of the European Union in Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Domestic Explanation. EU Diplomacy Paper, 9.

Treaty on European Union TEU (Consolidated version 2016). OJ C 202, 7.06.2016.

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union TFEU (Consolidated version 2016). OJ C 202, 7.06.2016.

Van den Boom, B. (2017). EU Region-Building in the Neighbourhood The Eastern Partnership’s Contribution in the South Caucasus. EU Diplomacy Paper, 4.

World Experience for Georgia (WEG). (2015). Georgian Energy Sector In The Context Of EU Association. Tbilisi: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Zasztowt, K. (2015). Azerbaijan and the EU: Prospects for Partnership Beyond Energy. PISM Strategic File, 2(65).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Partnerzy platformy czasopism