Financial innovations and sanitation services: the battle between low-income users and shareholders

Alberto De Oliveira

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/20999

Abstract


This article aims to show how changes in the model for financing basic sanitation affect social inequality and urban segregation, and to discuss alternatives that minimise the impact these changes have on low-income populations. The investigation focuses on mediations between sanitation policy and general urban policies in the more ample process of valorising capital, involving different scales of geography and forms of state action. Widespread privatisation and public–private partnerships have altered the role that rates charged to users play in financing sanitation systems. This, in turn, has an impact on low-income populations’ access to these systems. The study concludes that new models of financing tend to privilege spaces in the city that are attractive to private capital, and that investments in sanitation are supported by financial innovations that depend on the collective force of remunerating shareholders and maintaining investors’ expectations. Finally, the article approaches solutions that ensure low-income families’ access to public services, with special emphasis on subsidised rate systems based on the stratification of urban areas adopted in Colombia. The article concludes that this experiment presents both positive and negative aspects that may serve as starting points toward potential solutions for Brazil.


Keywords


This article aims to show how changes in the model for financing basic sanitation affect social inequality and urban segregation, and to discuss alternatives that minimise the impact these changes have on low-income populations. The investigation focuses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alzate, M. C. (2006) La estratificación socioeconómica para el cobro de los servicios públicos domiciliarios en Colombia:¿ Solidaridad o focalización? available at: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/4813/1/S0600655_es.pdf (accessed 22 November 2018)

Andrade, T.A.; Lobão, W. J. (1996) Tarifação social no consumo residencial de água. Texto para Discussão n. 438. IPEA, Rio de Janeiro

Bakker, K. (2003) From public to private to… mutual? Restructuring water supply governance in England and Wales Geoforum, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 359-374

Bezerra, F. & Da Silva, A.J. (2008) Descrição da estrutura básica de modelos de securitização de recebíveis no setor de saneamento. Revista Economia & Gestão, v. 8, n. 16, pp. 83-99

Castro, J.E. (2007) Water governance in the twentieth-first century. Ambiente & sociedade, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 97-118

Ceballos, A.I. & Arias, H.T. (2006) La estratificación urbana como indicador socioeconômico. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, v. 1, n. 10, pp. 214-221

Chenoweth, J. (2004) Changing ownership structures in the water supply and sanitation sector. Water international, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 138-147

Chong, S. & Poole, E. (2013) Financing infrastructure: a spectrum of country approaches. RBA Bulletin, September, pp. 65-76

Coady, D.; Grosh, M. & Hoddinott, J. (2004) Targeting of transfers in developing countries: Review of lessons and experience. The World Bank available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/464231468779449856/pdf/302300PAPER0Targeting0of0transfers.pdf (accessed 22 November 2018)

Dore, M.; Kushner, J. & Zumer, K. (2004) Privatization of water in the UK and France—What can we learn? Utilities Policy, v. 12, n. 1, pp. 41-50

Easter, K.; Feder, G.; Le Moigne, G.; Duda, A. & Forsyth, E. (1993). Water resources management. World Bank policy paper. 10.1596/0-8213-2636-8. available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236485226_Water_resources_management_World_Bank_policy_paper (accessed 22 November 2018)

European Council (2000) Water framework directive, directive 60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Communities , v. 327, pp. 1-72

Fix, M. (2004) A ‘fórmula mágica’ da parceria público-privada: Operações Urbanas em São Paulo. Urbanismo: dossiê São Paulo-Rio de Janeiro. Campinas, PUCCAMP/PROURB, pp. 185-198

Foster, V.; Gomez-Lobo, A. & Halpern, J. (2000) Designing Direct Subsidies for Water and Sanitation Services: Panama—A Case Study. The World Bank. available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/314341468763185877/Designing-direct-subsidies-for-water-and-sanitation-services-Panama-a-case-study (accessed 22 November 2018)

Gómez-Lobo, A. & Contreras, D. (2003) Water subsidy policies: A comparison of the chilean and Colombian Schemes. The World Bank Economic Review, v. 17, n. 3, pp. 391-407

Graham, S. & Marvin, S. (1994) Cherry picking and social dumping: utilities in the 1990s. Utilities policy, v. 4, pp. 113-113

Inojosa, R.M. (2001) Sinergia em políticas e serviços públicos: desenvolvimento social com intersetorialidade. Cadernos FUNDAP, n.22, pp. 102-110

Lefebvre, H. (1986) Le retour de la dialectique: 12 mots clef pour le monde moderne. Messidor/Éditions Socialies, Paris

Lefebvre, H. (2001) O direito à cidade. Centauro, São Paulo

Marcos, A. (2018) Los estratos en Colômbia: eres el lugar en el que vives. Published in website Jornal El País. Avaialble at https://elpais.com/internacional/2018/04/20/colombia/1524176587_818282.html (accessed 22 November 2018)

Maricato, E. (2003) Metrópole, legislação e desigualdade. Estudos avançados, v. 17, n. 48, pp. 151-166

Maricato, E. (2015) Para entender a crise urbana. CaderNAU, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 11-22

Massarutto, A. (2007) Water pricing and full cost recovery of water services: economic incentive or instrument of public finance? Water Policy, v. 9, n. 6, pp. 591-613

Nogueira, I. (2017) Fundo Gerido pela Caixa dá nó financeiro na Zona Portuária do Rio. Published in Jornal Folha de São Paulo. Avaialable at https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mercado/2017/04/1877953-zona-portuaria-do-rio-vive-no-financeiro.shtml (accessed 22 November 2018)

Núnez, J. (2010) Incidencia del gasto público social en la distribución del ingreso, la pobreza y la indigência. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. Avaialable at: https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Estudios%20Econmicos/359.pdf (accessed 22 November 2018)

OECD (1999) The Price of Water: Trends in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing. Avaialable at https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264173996-en. (accessed 22 November 2018)

Pinto, F.S. & Marques, R.C. (2015) Tariff recommendations: A Panacea for the Portuguese water sector? Utilities Policy, v. 34, pp. 36-44

Rogers, P.; De Silva, R. & Bhatia, R. (2002) Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability Water policy, v. 4, n. 1, pp. 1-17

Silva Filho, E. B. (2014) Securitização de ativos públicos para financiamento de projetos de infraestrutura: o caso brasileiro e a experiência dos BRICS Texto para Discussão n. 1989, IPEA, Rio de Janeiro

Smith, N. (2002) Gentrification, the Frontier, and the Restructuring of Urban Space. In: Fainstein, S. & Campbell, S. (Ed.) Readings in urban theory. Wiley-Blackwell, London

Smolka, M. (1979) Preço da terra e valorização imobiliária urbana: esboço para o enquadramento conceitual da questão. Texto para Discussão n. 0012, IPEA, Rio de Janeiro

Swyngedouw, E. (2006) Power, water and money: exploring the nexus. Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Washington, D.C.

Unnerstall, H. (2007) The principle of full cost recovery in the EU-water framework directive—genesis and content. Journal of Environmental Law, v. 19, n. 1, pp. 29-42

Vélez, C.E. et al. (1996) Gasto social y desigualdad logros y extravíos. In: Gasto social y desigualdad logros y extravios. Diagramas Ltda, Bogotá

Whittington, D. et al. (2015) A diagnostic tool for estimating the incidence of subsidies delivered by water utilities in low-and medium-income countries, with illustrative simulations. Utilities Policy, v. 34, pp. 70-81








Print ISSN: 1732-4254
Online ISSN: 2083-8298

Partnerzy platformy czasopism