BETWEEN REMEMBERING AND FORGETTING - PROCESSES OF CHANGING TOPICALITY OF POLISH HERITAGE IN CONTEMPORARY LITHUANIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2021.001Keywords
collective memory, culture memory, transformations of memory, Polish minority in Lithuania, Polish heritage, heritage communication, cultural heritage, multicultural heritageAbstract
The last century of Lithuanian history and the resulting dynamics of political and demographic change have radically transformed the role, meaning and forms of interpretation of Polish heritage in Lithuania. The purpose of the article is to observe the main directions of changes taking place within the cultural memory of Poles living in Lithuania - the largest national minority group in Lithuania. The report presents the processes of changing topicality of Polish heritage in Lithuania in three main areas of active cultural memory: history, art and religion. The first area is represented by objects related to Józef Piłsudski, the second one by the Pohulanka Theatre (now the Russian Drama Theatre) in Vilnius and objects related to Adam Mickiewicz, and the third one by objects related to the cult of Divine Mercy.
The article analyses official communication of these memory objects (published by the objects’ owners or official managers) as well as memory practices and rituals carried out in these objects and described on social media and in news articles published in Lithuania in 2017-2019. Observing various types of storage media, in this case, some selected objects of cultural heritage and rituals and texts accompanying them, it is possible to notice processes of variability, exchange, erasing, redefining memory and hence the dynamics of changes in the Polish collective identity in modern Lithuania.
The analysis of the formal ritualization and communication of these objects has enabled noticing several interesting trends, above all an occurrence of the phenomenon of polylogue of narratives and the process of universalization of Polish heritage in Lithuania and thus Lithuanian and Polish collective memory approaching each other.
The following analysis is valuable as a starting point for reflection on the transformation of the ethnic identity of Poles in Lithuania. The article is one of the first attempts to show the processes of Lithuanian Poles identity transformations through observations of their collective memory dimension. The article presents the main trends and indicates the further potential research directions.References
Antanavičiūtė, R. (2019). Menas ir politika Vilniaus viešosiose erdvėse. Vilnius: Lapas.
Assmann, A. (2013). Między historią a pamięcią. Antologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Brockmeier, J. (2002). Remembering and Forgetting: Narrative as Cultural Memory. Culture & Psychology, 8(1), 15-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0281002
Čepaitienė, R. (2009). Interpretuojant daugiakultūrį Vilnių: kontekstai, problemos ir galimybės. In: A. Bumblauskas (Ed.), Naujasis Vilniaus perskaitymas: didieji Lietuvos istoriniai pasakojimai ir daugiakultūris miesto paveldas (p.49-77). Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
Čepaitienė, R. (2010). Paveldosauga globaliajame pasaulyje. Vilnius: Lietuvos istorijos institutas.
Daukšas, D. (2011). Dominuojantis nacijos, teritorijos ir valstybės diskursas lietuviškoje 1988-1991 m. periodikoje. Vilnius: Liaudies kultūra.
Daukšas, D. (2012). Lietuvos lenkai: etninio ir pilietinio identiteto konstravimas ribinėse zonose. Lietuvos etnologija; socialinės antropologijos ir etnologijos studijos, 12 (21), 167-193.
Daukšas, D. (2014). Paribio identitetai: Punsko ir Šalčininkų atvejai. Etniškumo studijos, 2, 89-106.
Frėjutė-Rakauskienė, M., Marcinkevičius, A., Šliavaitė, K., & Šutinienė, I. (2016). Etniškumas ir identitetai Pietryčių Lietuvoje: raiška, veiksniai ir kontekstai. Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.
Geben, K. (2011). Wybór tożsamości na styku języków i kultur. In: T.Dalecka, & M.Dawlewicz (Eds.), W kręgu idei Miłoszowskich. Vilnius: Vilniaus Universitetas.
Geben, K. (2012). Kim się czują Polacy z Wilna, Solecznik i Trok. In: Burzyńska–Kamieniecka A., Misiak M., & Kamieniecki J. (Eds.), Kresowe dziedzictwo: studia nad językiem, historią i kulturą (pp.155-165). Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe.
Graham, B., Ashworth, G.J., & Tunbridge, J.E. (2000). A geography of heritage: power, culture and economy. Routledge.
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory, The University of Chicago Press. Retrieved July 11, 2019, from https://www.sfu.ca/cmns/courses/2012/487/1-Extra%20Readings/HalbwachsOnCollective%20Memory.pdf
Hill, J., & Wilson, T. (2003). Identity Politics and the Politics of Identities. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10702890304336
Jakučionis, S., & Beniušis, V. (2017, December 5). V. Landsbergis ragina vertinti ir J. Pilsudskio nuopelnus, ir klaidas. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from file: https://www.tv3.lt/naujiena/lietuva/936657/v-landsbergis-ragina-vertinti-j-pilsudskio-gimimo-metineshttp://www.faustyna.eu/lt/historia-obrazu-jezusa-milosiernego.htm
Janušauskienė, D. (2016). Ethnicity as political cleavage: The political agenda of the Polish national minority in Lithuania. Nationalities Papers, 44(4), 578-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.1156073
Janušauskienė, D. (2021). Identities of and Policies Towards the Polish National Minority in Lithuania. Ethnopolitics, 20(1), 136-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2020.1808331
Kalnius, P. (1998). Etniniai procesai Pietryciu Lietuvoje XX amziaus antrojoje pusėje. Vilnius: Žara.
Karpińska, G.E. (2004). Miasto wymazywane. Historia łódzkiego przypadku. Studia Etnologiczne i Antropologiczne, 8, 165-180.
Kasner, M. (2017). O metodologii badań kultury pamięci miasta postsocjalistycznego (na przykładzie współczesnego Wilna). Wilno: Slavistica Vilnensis.
Keightley, E, & Schlesinger, P. (2014). Digital media – social memory: remembering in digitally networked times. Media, Culture & Society, 36(6), 745-747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714532985
Laužikas, R. (2017). Komunikaciniai Lietuvos valstybingumo atkūrimo 100-mečio iššūkiai. Lietuvos kultūros tyrimai, 9, 26-48.
Manžuch, Z. (2015). Atminties institucijos: saugyklos, teatrai, lobynai ar duomenų bazės? (Memory institutions: depositories, theatres, treasuries or data bases?). Knygotyra, 126-147. https://doi.org/10.15388/kn.v51i0.7894
Mokrzecka, E. (2014, April 1). Litwini chcą zamieścić tablicę przy mauzoleum Piłsudskiego na Rossie. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://zw.lt/wilno-wilenszczyzna/litwini-chca-zamiescic-tablice-przy-mauzoleum-pilsudskiego-na-rossie/
Mokrzecka, E. (2018, November 14). Oddolna akcja w Zułowie: Ktoś przyjeżdża i sprząta, a ktoś mówi, że to nasze. Retrieved July 10, 2019, from https://zw.lt/wilno-wilenszczyzna/oddolna-akcja-w-zulowie-ktos-przyjezdza-i-sprzata-a-ktos-mowi-ze-to-nasze/
Ochma, E. (2020). When and why is the forgotten past recovered? The Battle of Warsaw, 1920 and the role of local actors in the production of memory. Memory Studies, 13(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017709874
Šapoka, A. (2019). Tikras, sukurtas ir sunaikintas Mickevičiaus memoriališkumas. Kaunas pilnas kultūros, Retrieved June 20, 2019, from http://pilnas.kaunas.lt/2019/03/12/tikras-sukurtas-ir-sunaikintas-mickeviciaus-memorialiskumas/
Stachowiak, B. (2012). Socjalizacja studentów do społeczeństwa informacyjnego na przykładzie Litwy, Niemiec, Polski, Republiki Czeskiej, Ukrainy. Studium porównawcze. Torun International Studies, 5(1), 77-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2012.006
Šutinienė, I. (2011). Daugiakultūrinio miesto istorija komunikacinėje tautinių grupių atmintyje: Klaipėdos ir Vilniaus atvejai. In A. Nikžentaitis (Ed.), Nuo Basanavičiaus, Vytauto Didžiojo iki Molotovo ir Ribbentropo. Atminties ir atminimo kultūrų transformacijos XX–XXI amžiuje. Vilnius: Lietuvos istorijos institutas.
Szacka, B. (2011). Historical consciousness. The empirical research results. Studia Socjologiczne, 1, 233–260.
Vansina, J. (1985). Oral Tradition as History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Wawrzyński, P., & Schattkowsky, R. (2015). Attitudes towards the Government’s Remembrance Policy in Poland: Results of an Experimental Study. Politics in Central Europe, 11(2), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2015-0012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 31
Number of citations: 0
