@article{Huzarek_2017, title={Knowledge Argument versus Bundle Theory according to Derek Parfit}, volume={5}, url={https://apcz.umk.pl/SetF/article/view/SetF.2017.027}, abstractNote={According to constitutive reductionism of Derek Parfit, a subject/person is not a separate existing being but his existence consists in the existence of a brain and body, performance of actions, thinking and occurrence of other physical and mental events. The identity of the subject in time comes down only to “Relation R” - mental consistency and/or connectedness – elicited by appropriate reasons. In the following article, I will try, relying on Frank Johnson’s Knowledge Argument, to argue in favour of the following conclusions: (1) a person/subject is a “fact”irreducible to body and physical relations with the environment and (2) a subject is something/”fact” non-reducible to mental occurrences.}, number={2}, journal={Scientia et Fides}, author={Huzarek, Tomasz}, year={2017}, month={Sep.}, pages={237–250} }