Dyskurs w obrębie prawa własności intelektualnej. Spojrzenie filozoficzno-prawne
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2013.004Keywords
law and economics, critical legal studies, Internet, intellectual property rightsAbstract
Present day sees the ongoing heated debate on the shape of intellectual property rights (IPRs). The paper aims to explore the background of ongoing conflict between right holders and the groups that challenge the regulations pertaining to the intellectual property. In pursue of that aim, firstly, the economical justification, which is the most prevailing justification of IPRs, is presented; it is then contrasted with the number of arguments put forth by the opponents, including those based on the thought of critical legal studies (CLS) movement. Finally, based on historical and philosophical account it is argued that the discourses witnessed in present day are merely repetitions of those that occured in the past. The socio-economic changes simply makes old arguments resurface, so that a new fair balance between rights and interests of all stakeholders could be attained.
References
Bauman Z., Wspólnota, Kraków 2008.
Bessen J., Meurer M.J., Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton 2008.
Cox R.W., Approaches to World Order, Cambridge 1996.
Dibble W., Justifying Intellectual Property, “UCL Jurisprudence Review” 1994, z. 74.
Dobrzeniecki K., Lex informatica, Toruń 2008.
Dreier T., Hugenholt P.B., Concise European Copyright Law, Biggleswade 2006.
Farrands Ch., The Globalisation of Knowledge and the Politics of Global Intellectual Property: Power, Governance and Technology, w: Globalisation: Theory and Practice, red. E. Kofman, G. Youngs, Londyn–Nowy Jork 1996.
Habermas J., The Crisis of European Union. A Response, Cambridge2012.
Kennedy D., Sexy Dressing Etc. Essays on the Power and Politics of Cultural Identity, Harvard 1994.
Lemley M.A., Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding, “Texas Law Review” 2005, z. 83.
Menell P.S., Governance of Intellectual Resources and Disintegration of Intellectual Property in the Digital Age, “Berkeley Technology Law Journal” 2011, z. 26.
Neacsu E.D., CLS Stands for Critical Legal Studies, if Anyone Remembers, “Journal of Law and Policy” 2000, z. 8.
Nordin I., The Rationality of Technology, „Science Studies” 1989, z. 2.
Peters M., Roberts P., Globalisation and the Crisis in the Concept of Modern University, “Australian Universities’ Review” 1999, z. 1.
Pipes R., Własność a wolność, Warszawa 2000.
Posner R., Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach, “Journal of Economic Perspectives” 2005, z. 2.
Posner R., The problems of Jurisprudence, Massachussets–Londyn 1990.
Reidenberg J., The Rule of Intellectual Property Law in the Internet Economy, “Houston Law Review” 2007, z. 4.
Sell K.S., Private Power, Public Law. The Globalization of Intellectual Propert Rights, Cambridge 2003.
Sell S., Intellectual Property and Public Policy in Historical Perspective: and Settlement, “Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review” 2004, z. 38.
Sell S., May Ch., Intellectual Property Rights. A Critical History, Londyn 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 274
Number of citations: 0