Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Login

Oeconomia Copernicana

Indifference Curve Analysis: The Correct and the Incorrect
  • Home
  • /
  • Indifference Curve Analysis: The Correct and the Incorrect
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 5 No. 4 (2014) /
  4. Articles

Indifference Curve Analysis: The Correct and the Incorrect

Authors

  • José Antonio Manuel Aguirre Sotelo Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business Loyola University New Orleans
  • Walter E. Block Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business Loyola University New Orleans

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2014.025

Keywords

Indifference curve, convex, concave, budget line

Abstract

The thesis of this paper is that when the indifference curve is concave to the origin, the optimal point on the budget line is not the corner solution on the highest (most north eastern) indifference curve, the analysis all too often offered in the literature, but, rather, somewhat paradoxically, the lowest (most south western) indifference curve. The economics profession, as articulated through the megaphone of intermediate micro economics texts, offers a mixed result in this regard. Some few do offer a correct analysis, but many do not; others ignore the issue entirely. The contribution of the present paper and the aim of our research is to provide a correction of the widespread but erroneous indifference curve analysis that appears in many of our intermediate microeconomics texts. Our methodology is one of contrast: we offer what we see as both the correct and the incorrect versions of indifference curve analysis.

References

Barnett, W. II, & Block, W. E. (2013). Subjective preferences and alternative costs. Journal of Philosophical Economics, 6(2). Retrieved from

http://www.jpe.ro /pdf.php?id=3089

Barnett, W. II, & Block W. E. (2010). Mises never used demand curves; was he wrong? Ignorant? No: The Antimathematicality of Demand Curves. Dialogue, 1, http://www.uni-svishtov.bg/dialog/2010/1.10.WB.pdf.

Barnett, W. II. (2003). The Modern Theory of Consumer Behavior: Ordinal or Cardinal?. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 6 (1).

Bernheim, B. D., & Whinston, M. D. (2008). Microeconomics. McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Block, W., Westley, C. & Padilla, A. (2008). Internal vs. external explanations: a new perspective on the history of economic thought. Procesos De Mercado: Revista Europea De Economia Politica, 2.

Block, W. (1999). Austrian Theorizing, Recalling the Foundations: Reply to Caplan. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2(4).

Block, W. (2003). Realism: Austrian vs. Neoclassical Economics, Reply to Caplan. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(3).

Block, W. (2005). Rejoinder to Caplan on Bayesian Economics, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 19(1).

Block, W. (2007). Reply to Caplan on Austrian Economic Methodology. Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2).

Block, W. E., & Aguirre Sotelo, J. A. M. (2012). Indifference curve analysis: beyond simplifying assumptions. Journal for Economics Educators; 12(1). Retrieved fromhttp://frank.mtsu.edu/~jee/2012/2_MS1211_pp7to12.pdf.

Boulding, K. E. (1955). Economic Analysis, Vol I. Microeconomics. 4th ed., New York: Harper & Row.

Browning, E. K. &. Zupan M. A. (2006). Microeconomics: Theory and Applications. 9th ed.

Callahan, G. (2001). Logical Economics vs. Mathematical Economics. February 17. Retrieved from http://www.mises.org/story/616.

Callahan, G. (2003). Choice and Preference, February 10. Retrieved from http://mises.org/story/1163.

Caplan, B. (1999). The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations. Southern Economic Journal, 65(4). Retrieved from

">http://www.gmu.edu/departments /economics/ bcaplan/ausfin2.doc

Caplan, B. (2001). Probability, Common Sense, and Realism: A Reply to Huelsmann and Block. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2(4). Retrieved from http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae4_2_6.pdf.

Caplan, B. (2003). Probability and the Synthetic A Priori: A Reply to Block. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.mises.org/journals/ qjae/pdf/qjae6_3_5.pdf.

Caplan, B. (2008). The Trojan Horse Example, June 16. Retrieved from http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2008/06/the_trojan_hors.html.

Caplan, B. (Undated). Why I am not an Austrian Economist.

">http://www.gmu.edu/depts/economics/bcaplan/whyaust.htm.

Carilli, A. M., & Dempster, G. M. (2003). A note on the treatment of uncertainty in economics and finance. Journal of Education for Business, 79(2).

Due, J. F., & Clower, R. W. (1966). Intermediate Economic Analysis, 5th ed., Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Ferguson, C. E. (1972). Microeconomic Theory. 3rd ed., Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Frank, R. H. (2008). Microeconomics and Behavior. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Friedman, D. D. (1990). Price Theory: An Intermediate Text. 2nd ed. Cincinati, OH: South-Western.

Garrison, R. W. (2009). An Armchair View of Escalators and Moving Walkways. In: F. G. Mixon & R. Cebula (Eds.). Expanding Teaching and Learning Horizons in Higher Education: Essays on Economic Education. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Henderson, J. M., & Quandt, R. E. (1958). Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

Herbener, J. M. (1996). Calculation and the Question of Mathematics. Review of Austrian Economics, 9(1).

Hope, S. (1999). Applied Microeconomics. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Hoppe, H. H.. (2005). Must Austrians Embrace Indifference?. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8(4).

Hülsmann, J. G.. (1999). Economic Science and Neoclassicism. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2(4).

Lancaster, K. (1974). Introduction to Modern microEconomics. 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Landsburg, S. E. (2011). Price Theory and Applications. 8th ed. South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Leftwich, R. H. (1973). The Price System and Resource Allocation. 5th ed. Hinsdale IL: The Dryden Press.

Leoni, B., & Frola, E. (1977). On mathematical thinking in economics. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 1(2).

Liebhafsky, H. H. (1968). The Nature of Price Theory. 2nd ed. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.

Machaj, M. (2007). A Praxeological Case for Homogeneity and Indifference. New Perspectives on Political Economy,

(2).

Mansfield, E. & Yohe, G. (2004). Microeconomics: Theory/Applications. 11th ed., New York: W.W. Norton.

Mathis, S. A., & Koscianski, J. (2002). Microeconomic Theory: An Integrated Approach. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

McCloskey, D. N. (1982). The Applied Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan.

Mises, L. von. (1998). Human Action. Scholars’ Edition. Auburn: Mises Institute. Retrieved from http://www.mises.org/humanaction/pdf/Human ActionScholars.pdf.

Mises, L. von. (1977). Comments about the mathematical treatment of economic problems. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 1(2).

Mises, L. von. (2009). Review of Man, Economy and State. March 18. Retrieved from http://blog.mises.org/9631/mises-reviews-rothbards-man-economy-and-state/.

Murphy, R. P. (2008). Austrian Realists. July 17. Retrieved from http://mises.org/story/3028.

Murphy, R. P., Wutscher R., & Block W. E. (2010). Mathematics in Economics: An Austrian Methodological Critique. Philosophical Investigations, 33(1), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9205.2009.01397.x/full.

Nicholson, W. (2005). Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions, 9th ed. Thomson South-Western.

Perloff, J. M. (2012). Microeconomics. 6th ed., Addison-Wesley, Pearson.

Quirk, J. P. (1982). Intermediate Microeconomics. 2nd ed., Chicago: Science Research Associates.

Raimondo, J. (2000). An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard. Amherst N.Y.: Prometheus Books.

Rajsic, P. (2010). Did Rothbard ‘Borrow’ the Income and Substitution Effects? April 8. Retrieved from

http://mises.org/daily/4223.

Rockwell, L. H. (2000). Rothbard Vindicated. July 7. Retrieved from

">http://www.lewrockwell.com /rockwell/rothbard.html.

Rothbard, M. N. (2004). Man, Economy and State, Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, Scholar’s Edition. Retrieved from http://www.mises.org/rothbard /mes.asp.

Rothbard, M. N. (1997a). Praxeology as the Method of the Social Sciences. In M. N. Rothbard (Ed.), The Logic of Action One. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Rothbard, M. N. (1997b). Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics. In: M. N. Rothbard (Ed.). The Logic of Action One. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Rothbard, M. N. (2009). A Note on Mathematical Economics. Retrieved from http://mises.org/daily/3638.

Schotter, A. (1994). Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. Harper Collins.

Stigler, G. J. (1966). The Theory of Price. 3rd ed. New York, N.Y.: The MacMillan Company

Stonier, A. W. & Hague, D. C. (1964). A Textbook of Economic Theory. 14th ed., New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Stringham, E., & Mark, M. (2004). Economic Analysis of Tort Law: Austrian and Kantian Perspectives. In: M. Oppenheimer & N. Mercuro (Eds.). Law and Economics: Alternative Economic Approaches to Legal and Regulatory Issues. New York: M.E.

Stringham, E. (2001). Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency and the Problem of Central Planning. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4(2).

Stringham, E. (2008). Economic Value and Cost Are Subjective. In: P. Boettke (Ed.). The Handbook of Austrian Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, (forthcoming).

Thompson, Jr., A. A. (1989). Economics of the Firm: Theory and Practice. 5th ed. Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Varian, H. R. (2006). Intermediate MicroEconomics: A Modern Approach. 7th ed. New York: W.W. Norton.

Vickrey, W. S. (1964). Microstatics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Wetzstein, M. E. (2005). Microeconomic Theory: Concepts and Connections. Thomson South-Western.

Oeconomia Copernicana

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2015-02-19

How to Cite

1.
AGUIRRE SOTELO, José Antonio Manuel & BLOCK, Walter E. Indifference Curve Analysis: The Correct and the Incorrect. Oeconomia Copernicana [online]. 19 February 2015, T. 5, nr 4, s. 7–43. [accessed 1.4.2023]. DOI 10.12775/OeC.2014.025.
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polish)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2014)

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 340
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Indifference curve, convex, concave, budget line
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop