La mediación filosófica en el diálogo entre ciencia y teología: un análisis del concepto de consonancia

Oscar Beltrán

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2017.024

Abstract


Philosophical intervention in the dialogue between science and theology: an analysis of the concept of consonance

 

In the last decades, a strong debate on the relationship between science and theology has taken place. In the early 1980, Ernan McMullin introduced the notion of “consonance”, defined as the spontaneous convergence of the conclusions presented by the natural sciences and theology on certain features or properties of the universe. In this paper, I shall try, first and foremost, to carefully look into the meaning that has been attributed to this relationship. Thus, I shall examine the possible implications derived from specific cases of consonance; I shall consider the connection between consonance and truth (as well as, symmetrically, the one that could be established between “dissonance” and falseness); I shall expand on the proposal for a dialogue based on different attitudes regarding consonance (rejection, indifference, acceptance and promotion); I shall evaluate the thesis that understands consonance as a cultural construction or an a priori accepted in certain contexts; finally, I shall mention certain variations of this concept, such as strong and weak consonance, or hypothetical consonance. Then, I shall explain the assumptions on which the idea of consonance rests: the unity and intelligibility of reality, the diversity of formal objects and the realism of knowledge. All these assumptions are comprehensive proof of the indispensable intervention of philosophy, as wisdom, in any kind of exchange that occurs between science and theology. And it is only from them that criticism regarding this issue is vested authority. Finally, I suggest a series of critical proposals on the notion of consonance. I shall stress, on the positive side, the opportunity that it offers to move towards a greater disciplinary integration and foster, at the same time, the ordering mission of philosophical wisdom. On the negative side, I shall point out the confusion between religion and theology, the tendency towards a kind of epistemic naturalism of theology, the uncertain creation of the idea of scientific realism and the aspiration to an excessive interference among disciplines.


Keywords


dialogue; consonance; science; theology; philosophy

Full Text:

PDF (Español)

References


Artigas, Mariano. 2000. La mente del Universo. Pamplona: EUNSA.

Barzaghi, Amerigo y Corcó, Josep. 2015. “Ernan McMullin’s Thought on Science and Theology: An Appreciation.” Open Theology 512–523.

Bennett, Gaymon y Peters, Ted. 2002. Ciencia y religión en diálogo. Un puente en construcción Puebla UPAEP.

Byrne, Peter. 1995. “Theology and Scientific Understanding.” En Companion Encyclopedia of Theology, editada por Peter Byrne y Leslie Houlden, 449–450. London–New York: Routledge.

Comisión Teológica Internacional. 2012. La teología hoy. Perspectivas, principios y criterios. Buenos Aires: Ágape Libros.

Coyne, George y Omizzolo, Alessandro. 2005. Caminantes del Universo – astronomía y búsqueda humana de sentido. Buenos Aires: CIAFIC.

Drees, Willem. 1990. “Theology and Cosmology Beyond the Big Bang Theory.” En Science and Religion: One World – Changing Perspectives on Reality, editado por Jan Fennema e Iain Paul 99–130. Dordrecht: Luver Academic Publishers.

Edwards, Denis. 1998. “Original Sin and Saving Grace in Evolutionary Context.” En Evolutionary and Molecular Biology – Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, editado por Robert Russell, William Stoeger y Francisco Ayala, 377–392. Vatican City State Berkeley, California: Vatican Observatory Publications – Centre for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Fulljames, Peter y Stolberg, Tonie. 2000. “Consonance, Assimilation or Correlation? Science and Religion Courses in Higher Education.” Science and Christian Belief 12/1: 35–46.

Harris, Lyndon. 2017. “Divine action: An interview with John Polkinghorne.” Consultado el 19 de julio. http://www.crosscurrents.org/polkinghorne.htm

Huyssteen, Wentzel van. 1998. “Postfoundationalism in Theology and Science: Beyond Conflict and Consonance.” En Rethinking Theology and Science: Six Models for the Current Dialogue, editado por Niels Gregersen y Wentzel van Huyssteen. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Juan Pablo II. 1989. “Carta al Director del Observatorio Vaticano.” L’Osservatore Romano (edición española) 12 de febrero: 19–21.

Juan Pablo II. 1996. “Mensaje a la Academia Pontifica de Ciencias.” L’Osservatore Romano (edición española) 25 de octubre, 5.

Ladrière, Jean. 2003. “Science et théologie.” Revue Théologique de Laval 34: 3–26.

Lambert, Dominique. 1997. “Monseigneur Georges Lemaître et le débat entre la cosmogie et la foi.” Revue Théologique de Louvain 28: 28–53.

McMullin, Ernan. 1981. “How Should Cosmology Relate to Theology?” En The Sciences and Theology in the Twentieth Century, editado por Arthur Peacocke, 17–52. Notre Dame: Univeristy of Notre Dame Press.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1981. “Theological Questions to Scientists.” En The Sciences and Theology in the Twentieth Century, editado por Arthur Peacocke, 3–16. Notre Dame: Univeristy of Notre Dame Press.

Papanicolau, Jorge. 2003. “Religión y Ciencia en el pensamiento de Juan Pablo II: importancia y responsabilidad del diálogo para una cultura verdaderamente humana.” Teología 82: 83–113.

Peters, Ted (ed.). 1998. Science and Theology. The New Consonance: Boulder CO: Westview Press.

Peters, Ted. 2001. “The Science-Religion Dialogue – An Ecumenical Catalyst?” Dialog: a Journal of Theology 40/3, 223–229.

Peters, Ted. 1996. “Theology and Science: Where Are We?” Zygon 31/2, 323–343.

Polkinghorne, John. 1996. Scientists as Theologians. London.

Polkinghorne, John. 2002. “Reduccionism.” voz en Giuseppe Tanzella-Nitti y Alberto Strumia Dizionario Interdisciplinare di Scienza e Fede. Roma: Urbaniana Univ. Press y Città Nuova.

Possenti, Vittorio. 2004. “Aspetti del dialogo fra scienza e fede.” En XXIX Semana Tomista Buenos Aires. Consultado el 19 de julio de 2017. http://www.sta.org.ar/cms/index.php/xxix-dialogo-entre-filosofia-teologia-y-ciencias

Poupard, P. 1994. Après Galilée. Science et foi: nouveau dialogue. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.

Poupard, P. 2000. “Prefacio” a Artigas, Mariano La mente del Universo.

Steinke, Johannes Maria. 2006. Konsonanz von Naturwissenschaft und Theologie. Gottingen: V&R.

Tanzella-Nitti, Giuseppe. 2017. “Il Papa e il Big Bang. Il caso Pio XII – Lemaître (1951–1952) a propósito del rapporto fra cosmologia e creazione.” Consultado el 19 de julio. www.disf.org.








ISSN 2300-7648 (print)
ISSN 2353-5636 (online)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism