Basel III Equity Requirements and a Contemporary Rating Approach

Günter Hofbauer, Monika Klimontowicz, Aleksandra Nocoń

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2016.005

Abstract


The new equity regulations of Basel III are more restrictive. Therefore the research objective of this article is to show the impact of equity regulations and to provide a proposal for professional preparation for the rating procedure for credit seeking companies. The research method applied is to give an overview of the relevant equity regulations of Basel III. From this research, we can derive that risk is the most important issue to be considered. In consequence, the outcome is a proposal for a contemporary rating approach for companies, containing an appropriate way how to control risk and perform in an excellent way. We can conclude, that the new equity regulations will not only have an impact on banks, but also on credit taking companies. Especially small and medium-sized companies will be affected. Furthermore in future banks intend to get an exhaustive insight into companies. The risks identified in the business will serve as a measure to calculate a risk adequate interest rate, depending on the rating class. Therefore it won’t be sufficient anymore to use only backward looking statements from the balance sheet or profit and loss statement. In this article we propose an evidence based approach for executing a professional and sustainable rating. Supporting this, we provide six dimensions for a contemporary rating approach.


Keywords


Basel III; equity regulation; rating classes; risk, sustainability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1988). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards. July.

Basel III (2010). A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. December 2010 (modified version: June 2011).

Hofbauer, G. (2008). Bankenkrise, Finanzkrise, Unternehmenskrise? Durch Strukturrating die Zukunftsfähigkeit verbessern. In: Going Public, Juni 2008, pp. 68-69.

Hofbauer, G. (2009). Bankenfestes Rating durch erfolgreiche Kunden- und Lieferantenbeziehungen. So decken Sie Risiken auf und steigern den Unternehmenswert, in: NWB Betriebswirtschaftliche Beratung, ISSN 1868-2979, Heft 5, pp. 150-155, Bochum.

Hofbauer, G., & Bergmann, S. (2008). Bankenfestes Rating im Marketing und Vertrieb. Leitfaden zur systematischen Ratingvorbereitung, in: BBB BeraterBrief Betriebswirtschaft, ISSN 1861-308X, Heft 5, pp. 371-375, Bochum.

Hofbauer, G., & Bergmann S. (2008). Optimales Rating für KMU, So überzeugen Sie Ihre Bank, Erlangen 2008.

Hofbauer, G., & Bergmann S. (2013). Professionelles Controlling in Marketing und Vertrieb, Ein integrierter Ansatz, Mit Kennzahlen und Checklisten, Erlangen 2013.

Hofbauer, G., & Hellwig C. (2012). Professionelles Vertriebsmanagement, Der prozessorientierte Ansatz aus Anbieter- und Beschaffersicht, 3. Auflage, Erlangen 2012.

Hofmann, G. (editor) (2015). Basel III, Risikomanagement und neue Bankaufsicht. Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt.

Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M. (2012). Banking risk management. Poltext, Warsaw.

Kopiński, A. (2008). Bank’s financial analysis. PWE, Warsaw.

Meissner, G. (2014). Correlation Risk Modelling and management: An Applied Guide including the Basel III Correlation Framework. Wiley, Weinheim.

Nocoń, A. (2016). The response system of modern central banks on banking system instability. Difin, Warsaw.

Sander, C.-D. (2014). Mit Kreditgebern auf Augenhöhe verhandeln. Betriebswirtschaftliche Beratung Kompakt, Herne.

Trueck, S., & Rachev, S. (2008). Rating based Modeling of Credit Risk: Theory and Application of Migration Matrices. Academic Press Advanced Finance, Amsterdam








ISSN 2300-1240 (print)
ISSN 2300-3065 (online)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism